Capturing carbon, once a fringe idea, may be key to fighting climate change

  • Published on Apr 20, 2019
  • Monday marks the 49th Earth Day. Despite decades of warnings from climate scientists, the world is still struggling to cut CO2 emissions, the main driver of climate change. Now, a handful of researchers and private companies are trying to fill in some of the gaps with what were once considered fringe ideas. Brook Silva-Braga reports.

Comments • 530

  • Stephanie Mujan
    Stephanie Mujan 6 days ago


  • Stephanie Mujan
    Stephanie Mujan 6 days ago


  • Stephanie Mujan
    Stephanie Mujan 6 days ago


  • ArgentCaliGirl Go
    ArgentCaliGirl Go 7 days ago

    man thinks he can do better than GOD?

  • ArgentCaliGirl Go
    ArgentCaliGirl Go 7 days ago

    At 5:59 they admit doing chemtrails....killing us all silently and slowly.

  • ClubMayview
    ClubMayview 11 days ago

    Trees eat carbon and cool the planet dum dums!

  • paxwallacejazz
    paxwallacejazz 14 days ago

    If we don't have a big break through with carbon sequestration we are doomed." We are under the gross misconception that we are a good species going somewhere important and that at the last minute we will correct our errors and God will smile on us. It is delusion. " Farley Mowat.

  • Colton M Brandt
    Colton M Brandt 17 days ago

    PR firm produced “news piece” lol

  • R Mason
    R Mason 21 day ago

    All the scary facts to spoil our day including deforestation and desertification.

  • tim ahlf
    tim ahlf 22 days ago

    There are already aerosols in the atmosphere from burning coal which has a masking effect on the sun,if you quit using co2 the aerosols fall out of atmosphere and the temperature rises faster more and quickly.

  • The Jones
    The Jones 22 days ago

    Quit the loose climate talk and let's get serious! =j

  • Supra Drift
    Supra Drift 24 days ago

    Why is that I don't believe a single word these people say ?

  • Dan O'reilly
    Dan O'reilly 28 days ago

    Even if we planted a forest tomorrow the size of the entire continental United States that would only reduce annual global C02 emissions by 10%.

  • Bestoink Dooley
    Bestoink Dooley 29 days ago +1

    Trying to take a paltry amount out at the same time gigatons are being spewed in? Yeah, right. Last year, 2018, after more than 30 years of IPCC warnings and hand wringing, a record amount emitted. As he mentioned in the video, the IPCC assumes humanity will wake up at some stage and implement some kind of miraculous, massive, world-wide , multi-trillion dollar carbon capture crash-program in time to avert catastrophe. Ha..ha..ha. Not gonna happen. Anyone waiting for some sort of seminal climate change event that is going to galvanize the world’s leaders into action will be tragically disappointed.Politicians, to get votes, do what they think most of their constituents want, and there are just far too many stupid people. If seeing the world’s coral reefs dying, its glaciers disappearing, permafrost melting, and the steady uptick in extreme weather and wildfire events does not spur them to action, it is much too late to hope that any single event will ever do so. Our grandchildren are so doomed. Extreme weather events will slowly, incrementally, inexorably ramp up, that's what science tells us. In the second half of the century, billions are going to starve to death and mass extinction of what's left of the animal kingdom. It's going to be ghastly. .

  • jim mayors
    jim mayors 29 days ago

    "normal CO2, just coming from the air".... Where did it come from before?

  • Diggity Dane
    Diggity Dane 29 days ago


  • jimannis69
    jimannis69 Month ago +2

    Everyone panic!
    The world is going to end in 12 years! (To be revised)
    Give all your rights and money to government, they promise to make it all better.

  • Christopher Calder
    Christopher Calder Month ago

    There is nothing unusual or wrong with Earth’s current average temperatures, which are constantly going up and down because our weather is constantly being affected by an almost infinite number of natural variables. Natural drivers of Earth temperatures include solar output levels, total planetary atmospheric density and pressure, the orbit of the Earth around the Sun, cycles of deep ocean currents, and cycles of the Moon’s gravitational pull on ocean water. The idea that CO2 controls Earth temperatures is not supported by the ancient ice core records or by measured temperatures recorded since the Industrial Revolution.
    The multi-billion dollar climate fear industry continues today because it is such a big money maker for scientists, literally thousands of green scam businesses, professional environmentalists, the media, and even universities seeking government research grants. Whipping up climate hysteria has been a powerful tool for politicians who want government committees to run the world, not free markets and authentic science. Countless American politicians have had their picture taken in front of giant industrial windmills, which by their proven environmental and economic track record are monuments to the stupidity of man, not a solution to any human problem. SEE

  • thereissomecoolstuff

    What was the chart? Typical.. was that a 2 degree rise in temperatures in 50 years?

  • Ian Barber
    Ian Barber Month ago

    That first "scrubber" looks pretty large, how much carbon produced manufacturing it? So in the machine's lifetime it could remove the same amount produced during it's manufacturing.

  • Frank Blangeard
    Frank Blangeard Month ago

    Climate change will be good for the world overall. For one thing, melting ice will open up vast areas to exploration for oil and natural gas.

  • Dave Carlson
    Dave Carlson Month ago

    Store it for when the earth is heading for an ice age from too low of CO2, then put it on the road, get methane from under the melting Permafrost in the Arctic, there is 70 Trillion tons we don't want in the atmosphere, it's 23 times as bad as CO2.
    We need a freeze field to drop over the methane bombs to keep it frozen for now until we figure out how to safely remove it.

  • Johnny Dominguez
    Johnny Dominguez Month ago

    Have the Brazilians stop deforestation of the rain forests.

  • CrazyLegs
    CrazyLegs Month ago

    Lol chemtrails

  • Bo Rood
    Bo Rood Month ago

    LMAO! Another libtard scam.

  • TheIndiana1
    TheIndiana1 Month ago

    Oh I get it, they are pretending that aerosols aren't currently being sprayed regularly (so don't look up).

  • Phats Donahue
    Phats Donahue Month ago

    Lol, any body have any clue how much carbon goes into the atmosphere from just one Mt Rainier blowing it’s lid? I guess we are fine as long as something doesn’t set more than one off at the same time. 😃

    • Phats Donahue
      Phats Donahue 29 days ago

      Word Pitbull 18, we do live in an insane society. They maybe had part of an argument in aiming to clean up car emissions esp. back in the days cars were carbureted. It’s laughable how little pollution most vehicles emit now days. It’s more about power changing hands, where they will absolutely force their “morality “ on you in the end. The green new death...

    • Pitbull18
      Pitbull18 Month ago +1

      Phats Donahue St. Helens put more pollution in the air then the past 100 yrs
      1 California forest fire puts more pollution in the air then all the U.S. in a year
      It’s like we live in an insane society
      The volcano erupted several times during the Holocene, the largest eruption took place in the year 1600. The 1600 eruption was the largest historical eruption in South America, measuring 6 on the Volcanic Explosivity Index. It occurred on the 19th February and continued with a series of events into March. Witnessed by the people of the city of Arequipa, its impact in the region was severe, wiping out vegetation and burying the surroundings with 2 metres (6 ft 7 in) of volcanic rock; it also damaged infrastructure and economic resources. The eruption had significant effects on Earth's climate, decreasing temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere, causing floods, famines and cold waves in numerous places, and depositing several million tons of acid. The climate disruption caused social upheaval in many countries such as Russia and may have played a role in the onset of the Little Ice Age.
      But yet the prophets of the liberal communist blame the people

  • John Smith
    John Smith Month ago +1

    Here, have a downvote. Man-made global warming is bullpoopy.

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      John Smith go research lol

  • Rose Phoenix
    Rose Phoenix Month ago

    For those people like to have a great responsibility for focus on for the future to keep planet Earth more trees more clean of rivers and lakes especially of a more important that is to breathe like everyone like what you do while you have or your exercise or something else that to do in your life that the way that you breathe in and breathe out because sometimes that are in the future that if nobody care about the environment the eagle sitting or even global warming it will be some disaster coming into the future like 2025 or 2030 or even 2020 or 2019 right now we're in because this is not a game anymore this is very serious that to keep planet Earth healthier stronger better and who is going to be responsibility find a past that done to the present and to the Future 81 to have of a responsibility that to keep planet earth green and beautiful excitement and more Adventure some new ideas new ways and new possible be that for everyone because sometimes that it is the true nice it is very important but some adults are not very important because sometimes I could be selfish foolish and not responsibility because the only one is the money and it's kind of sad you know money is not solution the solution is saving the planet anywhere of different destinations on Earth in different countries especially that the way that you're living like towns quiet towns small towns and specially big cities anywhere a different destination or anywhere around the world especially that we need to keep animals and plants to keep moving forward but not extinct for the future because everything must be keep going forward to breathe from you them other each other your family your children and even of your grandchildren for the future because everyone like to have responsibility but others are not responsibility but we need to keep trying that to stay focused and what kind of beers and responsibilities or anything else

  • Kevin González
    Kevin González Month ago

    ¿From Beijing?

  • Matthew Trzcinski
    Matthew Trzcinski Month ago

    Trees are slow. Plant hemp. Burn it to charcoal, bury the charcoal. Repeat.

  • turnip sucks
    turnip sucks Month ago

    Funny how a barely 100 years worth of record keeping based temperature tracking is a science of doom. And besides isn't Co2 a a by product of decay? And wouldn't a combination of better forest management (preventing huge and devastating forest fires), and increasing the amount of alternative energy sources a simple enough solution (nuclear, natural Gas, solar and wind)? Just makes sense to use less coal anyway?

  • steve119md
    steve119md Month ago

    Why is the left climate illiterate, baby killers, free free free, open borders...why?

  • David Cisneros
    David Cisneros Month ago +1


  • Hallking78
    Hallking78 Month ago

    A garbage incineration plant? LoL

  • TheVJProduction
    TheVJProduction Month ago

    Trees "DEY TERK ER JOAB!!!"

  • Joe Mack
    Joe Mack Month ago +1

    Neat idea but you're pissing in the wind.

  • Gordon Adams
    Gordon Adams Month ago +3

    Renewable energy is the future. While we frack around with fossil fuels, the rest of the world is working on the new technologies, leaving us behind.

    • Gnome Ann
      Gnome Ann Month ago

      E.B. Hobbs, while China has obscenely high pollution amounts in some places (chances are if you check an Air Quality Index, there is at least 1 place in China that has a max rating of 999), it actually has subsidized green energy projects. The Energy Administration is currently incentivizing solar and wind projects, so you are correct that China is trying to move forward.

    • E.B. Hobbs
      E.B. Hobbs Month ago

      +Johnny Dominguez yeah I thought that was funny too.. I'm not sure what "the rest of the world" he meant.

    • Johnny Dominguez
      Johnny Dominguez Month ago

      +E.B. Hobbs
      THEM?? 😅😆🤣🤣
      It's incredibly dangerous to live in Peking just from their polluted air and water alone! 😤😧😫😱

    • E.B. Hobbs
      E.B. Hobbs Month ago


  • Billy
    Billy Month ago +1

    Whenever you see a Google provided propaganda article under the video, you know its gonna be hilarious

  • Amellia Mendel
    Amellia Mendel Month ago

    Um, doesn't our food need co²? If you want a machine to remove carbon from the air I'll sell you a seed for a Sequoia for half that price, I'll even sell you 40 pinecones for 1/4 the price 😂

  • Keith Gass
    Keith Gass Month ago

    Interviewer: "Do you think this is part of the solution to climate change"
    Methane Dude: "Yes, I think this is part of the solution to climate change"
    .... Riveting

  • jim mayors
    jim mayors Month ago +1

    49th Earth Day. So, for 49 years we've been hearing gloom and doom within the next decade. Happy Birthday, Earth Day!

  • Keith Gass
    Keith Gass Month ago

    Um no. We need a carbon tax and use those funds to transition to alternative energy.

    • steve119md
      steve119md Month ago

      Force people to stop using gas?

  • Z-Man Overstreet
    Z-Man Overstreet Month ago

    R.I.P. plant food

  • Connor Simon
    Connor Simon Month ago

    It's impossible to strip the CO2 from the air. You would need to have equipment that would release more pollution than it destroys.

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      Connor Simon hey bud maybe look into research about this type of engineering

  • John Coloe
    John Coloe Month ago

    Direct Air Capture (DAC), coupled with Air-To-Fuels (ATF) technologies from companies such as Canada's Carbon Engineering, represent the kind of technological solutions to climate change that make sense and should be broadly implemented as quickly as possible.
    Converting the personal transportation sector to electric vehicles addresses a minority fraction of the global greenhouse gas problem. It would also cost a projected $50 trillion! Instead, liquid fuels that are chemically identical to their fossil fuel cousins, essentially transform conventional vehicles into carbon neutral forms of transportation upon first use. ATF-derived liquid fuels also integrate seamlessly with existing infrastructure and extend to every use (buses, trucks, farm and industrial equipment, even airplanes and power generation)!
    Combined with power generation from renewable sources (solar, wind, hydro/tidal, geothermal, etc.) and "green nuclear power" plants based Molten Salt Reactor designs, it is possible to avert a complete climate breakdown. But we have to act. And do so quickly!

  • handyman
    handyman Month ago +1

    yeah, lets take all the carbon out of the atmosphere so that we can destroy farming. without carbon theres no life, but i guess thats ok as long as the globalists become more wealthy

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      handyman you should read about these things

  • Petere Poet
    Petere Poet Month ago

    Grow more plants and trees. Don’t give us Wizard of Oz crap, oh, this machine that equates to the size of one Mosquito 🦟 in the entire USA is not going to scrub anything. It’s just more Al Gore gets money scheme.

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      Petere Poet it is so funny how prior to 2008 concern for a sustainable environment was agreeable for everyone. After that it became partisan. Yet your misinformed propaganda still makes you sound like you’re willfully stupid.

  • WS P
    WS P Month ago

    2:15 , wait, he's making methane!? I thought methane was the root of all of the climate problems, ya know, cow farts.

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V 29 days ago

      +WS P If you don't know what you're talking about, you give it a rest... Gasses are obviously used by us.

    • WS P
      WS P 29 days ago

      +Carissa V
      I'M JUST GOING BY WHAT THE GUY IN THE VIDEO SAID!!! I never heard the guy use the term "neutral carbons" Jesus, give it a rest.

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V 29 days ago

      +WS P You literally said you don't know about this stuff. Ever heard of neutral carbons? Does it not make sense to you that instead of extracting more carbon from the ground, we use what is recycled from the air? The media should not affect your research capabilities.

    • WS P
      WS P 29 days ago

      +Carissa V
      Why, he says it right in the video. He says he's mixing hydrogen and carbon dioxide, then methane is produced, his own words. I don't know crap about that stuff, just going by what he said. Did you not hear that? Have you not heard from left wing media and their ilk that says cows and agriculture are bad for the environment, that we should all become vegan? If you haven't, then I suggest you get your hearing tested.

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      WS P go take a chemistry class

  • 03avalanchetruck
    03avalanchetruck Month ago

    Meanwhile we produce CO2 for fizzy drinks.

  • J C
    J C Month ago +1

    Ahhhh plant some more trees.....

  • Ruthless Reid
    Ruthless Reid Month ago +1

    Yeah this and cow farts right CBS and AOC.

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago +1

      Ruthless Reid “not so easily amused” yet comments on cow farts on a report about cleaning up the atmosphere. Age does not always equate to wisdom, thanks for exemplifying.

    • Ruthless Reid
      Ruthless Reid Month ago

      +Carissa V fortunately not I'm young and not so easily amused.

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      Ruthless Reid truly feeling sorry for you. Hopefully you are old.

  • Marten Trudeau
    Marten Trudeau Month ago

    Climate change caused by CO2 gas is not a valid point, as long as the governments sprays chem-trails now for 20 plus years with aluminum and other metals making the land highly flammable. and have been weaponizing the weather, and have built directed energy weapons (DEW's) for decades and governments like the US has the power to use them covertly on unsuspecting people in California and elsewhere!
    The NWO is on the back of the “One Dollar Bill”, it's written in Latin “Novus Ordo Seclorum”.
    The NWO is the Freemasons, Vatican, Jesuits, Knights Templars, the elite class world wide, and assorted secrete societies. They're all Kabbalists who are the rich powerful and run the governments, corporations and institutions of the world.
    Climate change is a lie used take the rights of the people away.

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      Marten Trudeau lmao!! Good thing you’re old...

  • AbracadabrA 09
    AbracadabrA 09 Month ago +1

    Fake news, get back to your powerstroke diesel v8 truck, nothing to see here. Omegalol

  • Sparky
    Sparky Month ago

    OMG, these ppl are frickin insane.

  • WhatTheyDontTellYou

    Climate change propaganda.
    Don't believe the hype.

    • WhatTheyDontTellYou
      WhatTheyDontTellYou Month ago

      +Carissa V you should come with me then.

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      WhatTheyDontTellYou how do you explain the upward trends in air pollution ever since industrialization? Do you really concur that air pollution causes warming of the atmosphere? You should go back to school...

  • Stahlah
    Stahlah Month ago +1

    Chemtrails or areosol spraying already exist as the man said dimming the sun just a little and causing massive amounts of sinus infections and upper respiratory tract issues. Clouds aren't made in front of your eyes from the back of a jet exaust that doesn't dissapate. Anyone on here saying chemtrails don't exist either is just plain ignorant of daily life or hasn't looked up in a while. Different times of day , different temperatures,not just in "cold humid air" lol. Cool trails dissapate and do not turn Into a thin hazy cloud cover which lasts for hours and blocks the sun out. Get outside and pay attention. #agenda 2030 #wedonotconsent

  • James Rodgers
    James Rodgers Month ago

    There is no such thing as man made global warming. It's natural climate change that's been happening for 4 billion years.

    • cough pillbox
      cough pillbox Month ago

      Any reputable sources, my friends?

    • Stahlah
      Stahlah Month ago

      Agreed,unless you use geoengineering projects which the in and us gov have admitted to. Chemtrails

  • Who's That
    Who's That Month ago

    I love Global Warming so do my plants that need CO2. Never been cooler here. Hahaha BS all BS.

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      Who's That you should probably look at factual trends, if you don’t. That’s your problem and hopefully you’re just old... then younger people who don’t need an excuse to sustain their environment can handle business.

    I AM HUMAN Month ago

    Ahuh, they’re probably redistributing the C02 along with that carbon.

    JBIRD NELSON Month ago

    Sugar free
    Fat free
    Carbon free
    Crap free...

  • NesQuik2258
    NesQuik2258 Month ago

    It's too late the Democrats already said we all die in 12 years.

  • YoYass Pinedo
    YoYass Pinedo Month ago

    I prefer to burn in a hot sun then breathe toxic air so why block the sun? It’s about the quality of the air !!!! too??!!!!!!!!!

  • John Smith
    John Smith Month ago

    Harvery Weinstein will be held accountable in jail before the government is honest about climate. Never going to happen.

  • John Smith
    John Smith Month ago

    This is basically just another massive waste of time and money.
    Our government can't even hold bankers accountable. Are Boeing executives going to be put in jail for the 300 dead because they rushed the 737 Max 8 into production? No. Our government will never hold its own accountable. And you morons want this government in charge of climate?!?

  • Tramaine Terrance
    Tramaine Terrance Month ago

    Hello, Humans.

  • Andrew Stansbury
    Andrew Stansbury Month ago

    plant. more. trees.

  • Appliantologist
    Appliantologist Month ago

    If governments really wanted to capture billions of tons of carbon from the atmosphere, they would plant trees and not burn them. Trees are made up of about %40 carbon they take from the atmosphere.

  • Vitaliy Galenko
    Vitaliy Galenko Month ago

    Humans cause only 3.4 percent of annual CO2 emissions. Most of that gets filtered through trees and other plants. They are making it seem like its 100% us and not the earth releasing its own gasses every seconds far more than what we release. But all in all, keeping the earth healthy is our responsibility. Lets get rid of unnecessary plastic wrapping too!!!

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      Vitaliy Galenko if we can diminish that percentage why not?

  • ArgentCaliGirl Go
    ArgentCaliGirl Go Month ago

    So God created the heavens and the earths....perfect. Satan hates God and his creation, so what does he do? Convinces man to destroy it. The devil tells him, God is dead and that he is god and that man can make it better etc. etc. Well guess what people, man will get a big spanking from the earth and Christ has to come back to straighten us up. Take God out of the equation and we will destroys who's side are you on?

  • phoolishbwoy
    phoolishbwoy Month ago

    So they are capturing the food for trees. GL.

  • Mike Mike
    Mike Mike Month ago

    When humans die out, mother nature takes over, plantation clean the air at no time at all.

  • n Bernal
    n Bernal Month ago

    Does it catch Democrats? maybe you could suck up AOC in that thing

  • my back HURTS
    my back HURTS Month ago

    How is it powered?

  • Phill Huddleston
    Phill Huddleston Month ago

    Isn't that what trees and plants do?

  • ÆRational
    ÆRational Month ago

    Why not demand that companies install huge filtration systems directly on their smoke stacks?

    • Sucker Free
      Sucker Free Month ago

      That's water vapor. Greentards don't know the difference.

  • J. M.
    J. M. Month ago +1

    Cause heating of the Earth It is Methane, estimated at 6,875 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent (MMTCO2E).1 Approximately 50 percent of these emissions come from the five sources targeted by the Global Methane Initiative (GMI): agriculture, coal mines, landfills, oil and natural gas systems every Year. So METHANE is not the Answer. Mark is right If every family would plant 2 trees a year in World wide. Problem solved. Mark Tprodicus is right. You can buy tree that are 6 feet tall. There have been whole forest that been wipe out for fires. Plant trees in those areas.

  • uhadme
    uhadme Month ago

    Are YOU aware that plants breath in carbon? they need greenhouse gases in the same way that YOU need oxygen.
    At what point do plants 'suffocate' without carbon in the air? 280 ppm.. without that in the atmosphere all your plants will die. (nothing to eat)
    What are the current levels right now? 420 ppm worldwide average. What is the highest level historically? 7000 ppm
    That means we are critically low on carbon in the atmosphere right now... if you cause the plants to die.. animals will starve. no plants or animals for you to eat.

  • Zendreax
    Zendreax Month ago

    I'm just here to watch the npcs telling us to plant more trees, thinking we'd actually be able to plant enough to prevent so much CO2 from building up in the atmosphere.
    And then we have the antiscience individuals denying that it works which clearly gives an accurate representation of their education level.
    We rely heavily on oil and gas outside of just running motor vehicles, as just about every bit of plastic you see and use was conceived of oil and gas, medicines are made of oil and gas, specialty chemicals are made of oil and gas, etc. Oil and gas will not be going anywhere until the last painstaking drop is drained form this earth as there will never be a more efficient means of manufacturing these chemical based products to replace it, and no one is going to invest billions of dollars on innovating new technology while we still have oil and gas. Instead, companies are mitigating the issue via carbon capture devices and its storage.

  • Michael Baker
    Michael Baker Month ago

    It seems like, carbon from the air could be used to create carbon fiber solids. The possibilities from the made carbon fiber could be used for building to automotive.

  • andrew nguyen
    andrew nguyen Month ago +4

    This entire video is a joke. They take co2 from the air only to release more another way 🙄

  • Man-Ung Yi
    Man-Ung Yi Month ago +2

    So removing CO2 from air by manufacturing soda pop?.. Ugh, wake me up when there is real news.

  • Paul Miller
    Paul Miller Month ago

    Coca Cola is such a great company. Besides giving the world diabetes and filling the ocean with plastic.

  • shaunmark1
    shaunmark1 Month ago

    The tech will get better as well.

  • Texas Outlaw
    Texas Outlaw Month ago +8

    You know it’s a lie when RUclip posts their 2 cents and backing it up with silicon-pedia.

    • Dante
      Dante Month ago

      Texas Outlaw the general information box is automatically put on any video that is about climate change by the RUclip algorithm to stop the spread of false conspiracy theory claims

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      Texas Outlaw get off RUclip and go look at research of human contribution into air pollution...

  • Michael carpenter
    Michael carpenter Month ago

    cleaner air.....more carbon to put into even more plastic bottles.....genius

  • Another 90 days to change this

    Poor ne'erdowells in the comments. "If I can't do it or understand it, it's fake".

    • Johnny Dominguez
      Johnny Dominguez Month ago

      No kidding! Those global warming idiots have no idea on how to plant trees!! 😅😆🤣

  • Karvol Raklov
    Karvol Raklov Month ago +8

    I think it's a lot cheaper to plant trees. Its ridiculous to spend millions on expensive machines when the answer is in front of us.

    • Hailie Leonard
      Hailie Leonard 29 days ago

      Karvol Raklov trees can only do so much. They can’t fix everything. Actually helping the environment is a lot better than leaving the earth to die.

  • William Templar
    William Templar Month ago

    The news reader claimed "CO2 is the main driver of climate change"
    The mainstream media should lead by example. Cease their poisonous emissions and stop breathing for 6 munutes, its such a small price to pay to end all fears of climate change .

  • Lawrence Bottorff
    Lawrence Bottorff Month ago

    If someone is running a big C02 capture site, won't all the nearby plants die? Sure, a gas like CO2 will spread freely, but would a local sink cause a local deficit? I'm being serious.

  • njgrplr2007
    njgrplr2007 Month ago

    If we are really serious about reducing CO2 emissions, we should stop buying products from the dirtiest manufacturer on the planet - China. By the way, the vaunted Paris Climate Accord treats China as a "developing nation" and does not require them to take any concrete steps to reduce CO2 emissions. So if you want to help address climate change, the best thing you can do is buy products from one of the world's cleanest countries such as the USA.

  • Binh TC Nguyen
    Binh TC Nguyen Month ago

    If carbon can be captured, we can use it to make carbon fibers.

  • stopthecrazyguy
    stopthecrazyguy Month ago +1

    Need new and cleaner sources of energy. ASAP

  • Jason Starr
    Jason Starr Month ago

    left wing pushing the same old, tired, Al Gore narrative... read the IPCC reports. They've shown from ice cores in the Antarctic that the Earth goes through massive climate changes every 60,000 years or so, and we're due. stfu

    • Unmanned Ocelot
      Unmanned Ocelot Month ago

      And no i'm not saying the illuminati exists. I was simply using it as a reference

    • Unmanned Ocelot
      Unmanned Ocelot Month ago

      +Jason Starr For as much carbon that is put into that atmosphere by volcanoes, the same amount is taken back from the atmosphere in a natural cycle. The problem is we're adding carbon, and taking none back. This is well understood by scientists around the globe. The way science works, it simply would be impossible for a global hoax to exist. It would be larger than the illuminati.

    • Jason Starr
      Jason Starr Month ago

      +Unmanned Ocelot You're absolutely right that humanocentric impact on the environment needs to be addressed. And, I accept that we have had a huge impact on the environment. But I disagree that even if every person takes 100% responsibility for becoming totally sustainable, that carbon emissions will cease to be a challenge to the environment. Volcano eruptions put way more carbon into the atmosphere (so I've read) than humans do. In the end, we all have to "trust" some unidentified "scientist" or panel of scientists to get our facts, don't we?

    • Unmanned Ocelot
      Unmanned Ocelot Month ago

      You're skipping over the fact that the very same scientists who dig up those ice cores also understand that what we are doing to the atmosphere is very dangerous. The political left might be the ones running with the idea of climate change, but politics are separate from science.

  • planet__ X
    planet__ X Month ago

    ACME cloud scrubbers, instant holes and anvils.

  • stalled carton4
    stalled carton4 Month ago

    I had this type of idea when I was like 10. Like trying to capture CO2 instead of just letting it fly off into the atmo.

  • Mark W.
    Mark W. Month ago

    The Puerto Rican donkey girl at the cantina says it will cost more than WWII, but it could possibly work if everyone chips in $600,000. ( China and India, excluded due to colonialism.)

  • Robby S
    Robby S Month ago

    China and India are polluting the planet 10x more than us, but nobody wants to do a story about that. You Green New Deal loons want to end the American economy. That'll surely get China and India to cut their polluting 👍

  • Jesse Lagasse
    Jesse Lagasse Month ago

    Cheaper idea just plant more damn trees

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      Jesse Lagasse why haven’t all the trees being doing enough thus far huh?

  • largemouthbast
    largemouthbast Month ago

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Globalist! Hahahahahahahahahahahahaa...smh

    • largemouthbast
      largemouthbast Month ago

      Trusting in God is the way not on scientist or your own understanding. God bless

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      largemouthbast then your head is just very, very dense. I meant outside the US. You would rather be nationalist than globalist? Lmao. What is more effective in the long run?

    • largemouthbast
      largemouthbast Month ago

      +Carissa V hahahaha. Thats funny because I travel approximately 200 days a year!🇺🇸

    • Carissa V
      Carissa V Month ago

      largemouthbast you should travel more...