Launch of Orion EFT-1 on Delta IV Heavy, The First Step to Mars

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 дек 2014
  • LAUNCH REPLAYS: ruclip.com/video/hN2j2fQFP64/видео.html
    A Delta IV Heavy rocket thundered into orbit today from Space Launch Complex 37B carrying the very first Orion Spacecraft into orbit. This mission, labelled Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT-1) is unmanned and will test Orion's onboard systems and heat shield for a re-entry from lunar missions.
    Liftoff occurred at 12:05 UTC, December 5th 2014, Orion will separate from the second stage at around 3 hours into flight before re-entering Earth's atmosphere and splashing down in the Pacific Ocean.
    Launch was delayed from December 4th due to ground winds, and then problems with fill and drain valves on the Delta IV rocket.
  • Наука и техникаНаука и техника

Комментарии • 594

  • Andreas Tröls
    Andreas Tröls 28 дней назад

    Well. Looks rather obsolete now (from todays point of view) after the succesfull Falcon Heavy launch (and landing). Surely NOT the first step to mars. SLS will fly once or twice and then they will cancel the program because of costs. Future lies in reusable rockets. Same for the european ariane 6, so no NASA bashing.
    I bet the first vessel with humans landing on mars will be BFR (or its successor).

  • J Shepard
    J Shepard Месяц назад

    Orion + Delta Heavy? You know *that* wasn't cheap.

  • Aunat
    Aunat Месяц назад

    pffftt, nothing compared to a falcon heavy...

  • Human Footprint
    Human Footprint 2 месяца назад

    Elon Musk's mom is Canadian - south African estranged dad - move over, yankee doodle !! :)

  • Stuart Davis
    Stuart Davis 2 месяца назад

    LOL

  • beatrix tv.
    beatrix tv. 2 месяца назад

    i love you space

  • yagitka
    yagitka 2 месяца назад +1

    Elon just killed this today.

  • Brandon Edwards
    Brandon Edwards 2 месяца назад +1

    expensive and outdated technology

  • Robert Smith
    Robert Smith 3 месяца назад

    A new era of space exploration.....what space exploration?

    • Thomas Kundera
      Thomas Kundera 2 месяца назад

      The one started in the 50's, and still ongoing.

  • rad vlad
    rad vlad 3 месяца назад

    nice CGI cartoon along with fish eye lens camera. hahaha, total baloney. wake up guys , earth is flat and space is FAKE

    • Evolution Inc.
      Evolution Inc. 3 часа назад

      Space is fake? Explain what I saw when I pointed my telescope at Jupiter then. Explain what I saw flying over my head that was predicted as the ISS. Explain why, during a lunar eclipse, the Earth's shadow is ROUND?

    • rad vlad
      rad vlad 2 месяца назад

      6.5 degrees on a flat plane or on a ball? check mate Vlad!

    • Thomas Kundera
      Thomas Kundera 2 месяца назад

      @rad : At 40km of altitude, the angle under which the horizon is "down" is about 6.5°.
      I ask again: how did you measured that angle?
      How are you sure it's 90° and not 83.5° ?
      Can you show me? Thanks.

    • rad vlad
      rad vlad 2 месяца назад

      because the camera is just behind jumpers left shoulder pointing straight out. we can see from the cameras perspective which is the viewers eye level, that the horizon is visible at 25 miles up. when we see the same view from the same camera before take off we can again see the horizon at eye level.
      google "vanishing point perspective and look at some diagram pictures. to understand is easier if you look at some pictures instead of reading about it. only on a flat plane the ground rises to meet the viewers eye level. on a ball, no matter how big, since you are on the tippy top all land will descend down from you. never rises to meet eye level. you might have to draw some pictures to get it.

  • Podno zulo
    Podno zulo 3 месяца назад +1

    Going back to the older style of rockets with capsules very dependable and much safer it's a proven method that works .

  • Guleru Mc-guru
    Guleru Mc-guru 3 месяца назад +1

    Can someone answer me please? This rocket looks to me that it can land humans to moon already. Why still waiting for the SLS or other private programmes?

    • aleksander suur
      aleksander suur 2 месяца назад +1

      +Thomas Kundera
      Always a pleasure to geek out on the space topics over internet

    • Thomas Kundera
      Thomas Kundera 2 месяца назад

      @aleksander: Thanks for your interesting and informative comments :-)

    • aleksander suur
      aleksander suur 2 месяца назад +1

      On orbit assembly is very much a thing, it's not a magic bullet however. First launch costs, scales linearly with how many launches you need. Secondly, launch cadence, how fast can you pull off the required number of launches, these things can take months to get ready for next launch. And then there is added complexity, mass and cost of on orbit assembly. Nothing impossible in any of these things obviously, but engineering is all about compromises, if you can launch something in one go, it's almost certain to be a better compromise than multiple launches.

    • Thomas Kundera
      Thomas Kundera 2 месяца назад

      A way to use that rocket to go to deep space could be in several launch: sending and assembling a lunar (or other destination) spacecraft in low Earth orbit, with something like 3 to 4 launch could be enough.
      But it may be more expensive and complex than waiting for the next SLS or Falcon generation.

    • aleksander suur
      aleksander suur 2 месяца назад +1

      It can not land humans on Moon, way too small. Even the first iteration of SLS isn't quite enough.
      As for difference between this and falcon heavy, falcon heavy has double the performance for third the cost.

  • panda44r
    panda44r 3 месяца назад +2

    SCIENCE!

  • Aerohk
    Aerohk 3 месяца назад

    Why not use the falcon

    • Nolan Burke
      Nolan Burke 3 месяца назад +1

      The Falcon 9 with the most payload capability at the time of this launch was v1.1, which could carry only 13,000kg to Low Earth Orbit. Orion weighs in at 25,000kg, meaning that it could not make orbit with v1.1. Additionally, Orion was to be tested at a higher reentry velocity (to simulate a return from the moon), which required a higher orbit and more fuel. Falcon did simply not have enough payload capability at the time, and still doesn't now (at least for this mission, F9 Full Thrust can do 22,000kg to LEO)

  • M. S. L.
    M. S. L. 3 месяца назад

    So did they alter the design to use SRB's or is that a different system I've been seeing?

    • M. S. L.
      M. S. L. 3 месяца назад

      Nolan Burke yes... Everything you said is obvious. What I'm asking is did they replace these liquid fueled side rockets with the SRB's (or maybe vice versa) because I've seen what I thought was all the same vehicle (possibly different generations) with SRB's & in this triple liquid fueled configuration. Or, are they two completely different vehicles from the same family of rockets. Thanks.

    • Nolan Burke
      Nolan Burke 3 месяца назад

      These boosters are essentially two other rockets without the payload or second stage that have been strapped to the side of a fully-built rocket. They aren't the typical SRBs that fly on the other Delta vehicles, they run on the same propellants and have the same engine as the center stage. It's sort of like Falcon Heavy but with the Delta rocket, per se.

  • Jake Heke
    Jake Heke 3 месяца назад

    I see curvature

  • Thomas Wijgerse
    Thomas Wijgerse 3 месяца назад +2

    THEM TRIPPLE MAINSAILS THOUGH!

  • Mark Tercsak
    Mark Tercsak 3 месяца назад

    Obama's fault as per the delay since the idiot killed far more practicle Ares rocket program.

  • Carver
    Carver 3 месяца назад

    It's like Falcon Heavy's retarded little brother.

  • Esri Sihombing
    Esri Sihombing 4 месяца назад

    DYNAMO STAR......bila bumi berputat dr timur kebarat itulah siang dan malam jika dr selatan keutara atau satu lingkaran matahari disebut setahun lalu utara-selatan bulan mengitari bumi sedang timur-barat menghadap matahari .Didalam astroid ada lima planet diluar tujuh atau dua belas planet tiap bintang (Earth/9) sama bergerak satu jari-jari matahari Akibat methamorphosa yg terganggu (live) dan authomic yg kacau (energie) maka planet Mars thn 1986 banjir air bah dan sekarang pulih kembali dgn peradaban manusia yg tradisionil dr AgBrvoYS-Solar2017,

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      Anything you say, sunshine?

  • rjet43
    rjet43 4 месяца назад +1

    When did they launch it?

    • Tony James
      Tony James 4 месяца назад +1

      3 years ago, approx, the vid was uploaded Dec 5th 2014

  • Greeneyes3005
    Greeneyes3005 4 месяца назад

    Awesome Rocket.. but the camera is crap.... the Rocket seems to jump forward when leaving atmosphere.. which is weird... and on the limb of the ‘earth’ the continents... are continually changing location shape.. and colour from bright green to darker green etc whilst the cloud & co all seem to remain the unaffected. Also there are digital objects on the horizon . can anyone explain these phenomena??

  • Ruzaini Roosfa
    Ruzaini Roosfa 4 месяца назад

    fake hologram launch

  • Dorman Davis
    Dorman Davis 4 месяца назад

    Come on where are all those flat earth conspiracy theorists those idiots that say we haven’t gone in the space anymore remarks from them yet the earth is round we gone to the moon and we have gone into space.

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      No matter what evidence you show them, they will call fake. They don't want to know.

  • Philip Dunne
    Philip Dunne 4 месяца назад

    NASA will never get to Mars ... if you look at the stage progression timetable they have laid out, it's ridiculous, at their pace it would take decades to work through and deliver such an innovation. Not ... going ... to ... happen.

    • Philip Dunne
      Philip Dunne 2 месяца назад

      Only stupid people put money on betting. Gambling is a fools game.

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      Care to make a wager? You can lay down a bet in Vegas if you want.

  • ThatWierdKidInClass .com/Why
    ThatWierdKidInClass .com/Why 4 месяца назад

    How they like them G’s

  • Dean Borchert
    Dean Borchert 5 месяцев назад +5

    I applaud their achievement, but 50 years ago, we had a "heavy" rocket too. There were 5 main engines at 160,000,000 Horsepower each. Takeoff weight was 3,250 tons. It went from zero MPH to mach 6 in 3 1/2 minutes. Payload was 261,000 Lbs. We built 13 of them, then shut it down, destroyed all the parts and patterns. And sat under a tree looking up at the stars, wondering why did we bother.

  • jimbo16720
    jimbo16720 5 месяцев назад

    I understand they need money but JFK said 10yrs and they started from scratch and did it in 9yrs. Now days it takes longer then that just to ok starting on one.

    • jimbo16720
      jimbo16720 2 месяца назад

      Before 1970...how's that? It's beside the point it took them much less time to build a rocket, navigation system, computers, lunar module, and to learn all the things they needed to land on the moon then it's taking them now to build a rocket using some of the same equipment.

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      JFK said they would do it by the end of the decade, not in ten years.

  • Mack M
    Mack M 5 месяцев назад

    AMAZING.... but why does Space X have better quality videos??

  • Ted G
    Ted G 6 месяцев назад

    I don't trust it, I'm sorry, would prefer something more simple, way to many boosters..

  • Rembang Salt City
    Rembang Salt City 8 месяцев назад

    EARTH IS FLAT

  • - TM
    - TM 9 месяцев назад

    probes maybe

  • - TM
    - TM 9 месяцев назад

    you will never make it to mars. just imho

  • Walker Smith
    Walker Smith 9 месяцев назад

    So still no moon flight in last 40 years, right? And you are talking about Mars???

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      Chinese got a lander there a year or so back.

    • Lee Lankford
      Lee Lankford 4 месяца назад

      Walker Smith we've been there why waist money to go back, that's old news

    • swmark78
      swmark78 6 месяцев назад

      He haven't go back to the Moon because we have been so busy getting ready to go to Mars! Duh! /sarcasm

  • Robbert Nijgh
    Robbert Nijgh 10 месяцев назад

    just a few months and this will be the second step cause space x is better

  • Chu Bumpy
    Chu Bumpy 10 месяцев назад

    What's up with the burning tower? Is it just burning off the vaporized hydrogen so it doesn't build up near the pad?

  • Camiole
    Camiole 10 месяцев назад

    Personally I prefer the Delta V M+ with it's SRM (Solid rocket motors) or SRB (solid rocket booster), I always preferred them on the space shuttle and all of the solid fuel boosters like
    the Ariane family rockets ❤️🇪🇺🇫🇷. I love their power and the SMOKE !!! SRY DELTA 4 HEAVY. BTW, I LOVE NASA I always loved watching live launch but I would love if it could advance even more like SpaceX, like landing stages and going to Mars by the 2020's rather than the 2030's, ❤️❤️❤️ NASA ❤️❤️❤️

  • Jason Lott
    Jason Lott 10 месяцев назад

    Why did the commentator state the velocity at 47 seconds to be 1341 ft/sec which is clearly supersonic and then again at 2 min 2sec that the velocity was again 1341 ft/sec. I hope he was just reading from a script and lost his place rather than adding commentary after the fact. Does anybody else have a better explanation?

    • Guy Smith
      Guy Smith 3 месяца назад +1

      Even trained people make mistakes. News at 11.

  • skyprop
    skyprop 11 месяцев назад

    3:03 I think the Earth is flat .....DUH!!!!

  • BOI Davis
    BOI Davis Год назад

    badass

  • Michael Adkins
    Michael Adkins Год назад +1

    Heavy is right .... heavy in tax dollars!!!

  • Michael Adkins
    Michael Adkins Год назад

    Sorry ... don't understand the reliance on three engines for orbital launch much less one. Lose one .... when? ... the launch is unsuccessful.

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      Because you cannot get enough thrust out of one rocket to get it up there.

  • swimsoundwave
    swimsoundwave Год назад

    Lol they left erf

  • Johnny Hazer - CZ
    Johnny Hazer - CZ Год назад

    0:23 new Era of american space bla bla bla ...... hey u idiot Elon Musk And Spacex is new Era !!!!! no this 50 years old crap without gear....

  • overlycreative1
    overlycreative1 Год назад

    Still years after this video was published, this Orion mission is the most brain dead idea ever. Just contractors, politicians all seeking jobs for non existent money and power to go someplace that has no future for anyone in the human race. Devote this money to the real problem in our lives, Fukushima Daiichi . Can you say killing us softly?

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      Welfare gets around a trillion dollars a year. NASA gets about 20 billion. You really think that drop in the bucket is going to solve all of mankind's woes?

    • overlycreative1
      overlycreative1 11 месяцев назад

      I'm glad to have seen your reply. What is so simpleton about things like Fukushima, Hanover, Santa Susana and a myriad of other nuclear disasters that need our primary attention? 1 single atom of plutonium can give a person cancer. You my friend are delusional if you think we can get to Mars without the sum of the human race to live long enough to be taxed into oblivion while the elite party at your and mine expense. Been there and done that. Smiles to you.

    • Mike Paulk
      Mike Paulk 11 месяцев назад

      overlycreative1 simpletons like you are why humanity sucks

  • RandomRoulette
    RandomRoulette Год назад

    And here comes Orion around the bend, its neck and neck, this is going to be a close one folks... nice presenter.

  • Genssy Ullmark
    Genssy Ullmark Год назад

    wow!! im really looking forward to se the video of earth when orion is leaving low earth orbit. imagine how nice seeing anything else then just a tiny little bit of its curve.. cool.

  • Fred Marlin
    Fred Marlin Год назад

    Waste of money. Will never go to Mars. LOL

  • Franco M
    Franco M Год назад

    I am awestruck by every launch.

  • James Hannon
    James Hannon Год назад

    What a beast, almost looks like an office building lifting off!

  • Harry Amadeo
    Harry Amadeo Год назад +1

    At 0:00, what is that red flame over on the left?

  • JustAgility
    JustAgility Год назад +4

    Flat earthers come out come out wherever you are!

    • Harry Amadeo
      Harry Amadeo Год назад +4

      They won't. I, too, would like to bash them with comments :P

  • thucydides Neo
    thucydides Neo Год назад +1

    How about going to the Moon first. We've never been there.

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      Well you've never been there. And I really doubt you ever will. You would have to crawl out of your mothers basement.

    • BadWolf HS
      BadWolf HS Год назад +3

      How about going to school first. You've never been there.

    • Shubham Kejriwal
      Shubham Kejriwal Год назад +1

      thucydides Neo -_- Apollo WAS A REAL THING FOR GOD'S SAKE!!!!!!!!!!

  • 757Watson
    757Watson Год назад +7

    Earth looks round.

    • Undying Legends
      Undying Legends Месяц назад

      flat Earthers​ are gonna be so triggered after seeing this

    • BOB
      BOB Год назад +1

      camera trick

  • Amelia Rufus
    Amelia Rufus Год назад +2

    my uncle got to go over to florida and see this it was so cool

  • 人活着钱没了
    人活着钱没了 Год назад +27

    this is massive, respect from China

    • Ruzaini Roosfa
      Ruzaini Roosfa 2 месяца назад +1

      人活着钱没了 how can u watch youtube in china

  • Ryan Gerard
    Ryan Gerard Год назад

    Please without animations !!

  • Rct
    Rct Год назад +2

    The hell is this NASA vs SpaceX crap? It just like arguing about whether or not Pokemon Red is better than Pokemon Blue.

    • J Shepard
      J Shepard Месяц назад

      Rct
      Yeah, because SpaceX is so much better. 😁👍

  • Diego Pusineri
    Diego Pusineri Год назад +1

    So.... NASA is finally going to leave their non-launch-escape, always-exposed-heatshield ride of death behind?

    • J Shepard
      J Shepard Месяц назад

      Hey, it was a very impressive death trap!

    • David Knisely
      David Knisely Год назад

      Well, even with this successful test, NASA can't put anybody into orbit again just yet. That will probably have to wait until SpaceX's Dragon V2 spacecraft flies in 2018.

    • Diego Pusineri
      Diego Pusineri Год назад +1

      Referring to the Space Shuttle, finally left behind as a way to put people in orbit.

    • David Knisely
      David Knisely Год назад

      Uh, no, the Orion spacecraft has a launch escape system and a proper ablative heat shield that is exposed only for reentry and was successfully tested on this flight.

  • pbmdh
    pbmdh Год назад +17

    So many keyboard warriors on here trashing NASA thinking they know dick about anything even remotely associated with designing a fucking rocket. The comments below, man I had myself a good laugh. 'Falcon heavy bluh bluh bluh.'

    • AhzekAhriman
      AhzekAhriman 5 месяцев назад

      I'll talk about Falcon Heavy when I see it, its introduction has been delayed so many times, for so many years that I'm starting to doubt they're gonna make it.
      I don't understand all those dipshits, if not for NASA there would be no SpaceX.

    • DSS 71
      DSS 71 Год назад +1

      The SpaceX crowd is like Camelot.. Tis a silly place... funny,its the crowd that makes all this out to be some kind of one-up competition. I really don't think it's like that.These agencys and companys are just going and doing space stuff. I'm enjoying the variety in all of this stuff and ever since that stupid shuttle has finally dried up and blown away the space program is like a free dog running in the meadow!! LoL

    • 1138thz
      1138thz Год назад +2

      **nutsackmania** Finally a guy that knows what he is talking about. You get a four Martini rating 🍸🍸🍸🍸
      N1 Failures.
      Failure 1 KORD system early shut down
      Failure 2 ingestion of foreign debris caused KORD to shut down all 1st stage engines
      Failure 3 Pogo caused an uncontrollable spin rate and loss of control.
      Failure 4 Ruptured fuel lines in the central 6 engines of stage one caused by hydraulic shock at shut down.
      Like you I see no direct relationship between the number of engines and the failure of the N-1 first stage.
      And as I am sure you know the R-7 AKA Soyuz rocket family has 20 engines in its first stage and is in fact one of the most reliable ELV's ever made.
      Cheers

    • Ryan Gerard
      Ryan Gerard Год назад

      +Coolstorm10
      Really? Well, I have to read more about it

    • Ryan Gerard
      Ryan Gerard Год назад +1

      The clustered arrangement is not the problem

  • Steffan Jansen van Vuuren
    Steffan Jansen van Vuuren Год назад

    The computerized imaging shows stars, but the actual video shows no stars...
    Why?

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      Did you ever consider going to a camera store and asking them why? They would be happy to explain it to you, and it would only take a minute.

    • Jesse
      Jesse Год назад

      redmonkeyass26 so that's why in Apollo mission has no stars in video that explain it

    • redmonkeyass26
      redmonkeyass26 Год назад

      because real cameras cant capture stars due to exposure settings.

    • nutsackmania
      nutsackmania Год назад

      cause your mom sucks chode

  • Albert Medina
    Albert Medina Год назад

    I was there at KSC for this :)

  • StickyScissors
    StickyScissors Год назад +13

    Jesus christ, i'm glad i don't use youtube comments to gather spacecraft information, it's a total shitshow down there vvvv

    • mattybeatzkidd
      mattybeatzkidd 2 месяца назад

      Dying laughing at this .. your comment is perfectly situated to where its just before the shit show

  • Jack Thecat
    Jack Thecat Год назад

    Big ass rocket 25 ton capacity to LEO.

  • Harald Jan Dahle
    Harald Jan Dahle Год назад

    Impressive as hell!

  • The_Blazer
    The_Blazer Год назад +9

    Fun fact: for whatever reason, the Delta IV is the only rocket to use liquid hydrogen for both the booster stage, rather than kerosene. So in theory, it's the world's first environment-"friendly" rocket, if you ignore the boosters crashing into the ocean...

    • GenericFakeName
      GenericFakeName 6 дней назад

      But my dude, efficient combustion of hydrocarbons make harmless exhaust. A kerosene rocket (heck even a good modern gasoline engine) doesn't do much worse than produce water vapour as exhaust. It's the mines, heavy industry and power stations you need to worry about.

    • theuncalledfor
      theuncalledfor 2 месяца назад

      +David Knisely
      What do you think happens to water vapor in the atmosphere? Does it stay, like CO2 does?
      Or does it, oh, I don't know, _liquefy to form clouds and eventually rain down to the surface?_

    • Thomas Wijgerse
      Thomas Wijgerse 3 месяца назад

      currently hydrolox is not produced in a very environment friendly way, that will get better though, no doubt. atleast most companies are not using hypergolics anymore.

    • David Knisely
      David Knisely Год назад +1

      Yea, but it turns out that water vapor (the exhaust of the Delta IV) is also a greenhouse gas :-).

  • Sonny Ng
    Sonny Ng Год назад +1

    Very cool, inspiring! US aerospace techs are conservative historically per safety reasons as they should. In contrast, Soviets space milestones initially outpaced those of American but they paid for the hurried advances in bloods. Russian rockets and Soyuz are reliable old techs yet stagnate compared to burgeoning private US space industry.

    • Matthew Black
      Matthew Black Год назад

      Soyuz 1 lost one Cosmonaut - Vladimir Komarov on April 24th 1967. Three Cosmonauts; Dobrovolski, Patsayev and Volkov died on Soyuz 11, June 30th 1971. In all the years since then, Russia has lost no one else but they've come very close a couple times.

    • Tomáš Neumajer
      Tomáš Neumajer Год назад

      And from times of STS - this is step back for me at all. We are not flying from the space anymore. We just falling again.

    • Tomáš Neumajer
      Tomáš Neumajer Год назад

      Learn more about space program victims. Russians have 2 astronauts died during hundreads of mission. NASA has 15 dead already (RIP all of them). Of course sometimes they have some vehicles failed, but who no?
      They have big on ramp explosion with many casualties far ago.
      But for example STS has not ability to automated flight. Russian Buran has to do, and use it for first (and only) mission.
      Its sad, that world of science is divided by politics. If all can work together, we could be on Mars allready.

  • Jesse Lockhart
    Jesse Lockhart Год назад +2

    Go baby go..

  • FalkonX3000
    FalkonX3000 Год назад

    fake cause earth is flat

    • iloveteaalot
      iloveteaalot Год назад

      Yo mama is fake.

    • 45445 Angels
      45445 Angels Год назад +1

      ok here have some cookies and pancakes

  • Chris Musix
    Chris Musix Год назад +68

    "Switch to Kerbal Space Program mode!" ~1:07 mark.

    • Ultimate Steve
      Ultimate Steve 3 месяца назад

      Except KSP has better graphics.

    • shbitz
      shbitz 10 месяцев назад +3

      RobertsDigital sorry shawarmas only !

    • metropod
      metropod Год назад +7

      +RobertsDigital kerbalspaceprogram.com/en/ it's an indie spaceflight sim starting the Kerbals, little green aliens who have hired you to run their space program. Also search YT for "Scott Manley"

    • RobertsDigital LAX
      RobertsDigital LAX Год назад +3

      Kerbal Space program?
      Do they serve Kebabs on board?

    • metropod
      metropod Год назад +3

      with "Realism Overhaul" two...

  • Rodney Dekker
    Rodney Dekker Год назад

    why is it when they enter the atmosphere it heats up on entry but going up nothing at all i think this is bullshit fake

    • Lee Lankford
      Lee Lankford 2 месяца назад

      Rodney Dekker atmosphere creates friction and heat only on reentry, the vacuum of space has no atmosphere, your not gonna experience heat or friction from the atmosphere when your leaving it, your already in it, just because you don't understand something doesn't make it fake, read a book!

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад +2

      When the rocket is in the thickest part of the atmosphere, it going slowly. It speeds up as it burns off fuel and by that time it is into thinner and thinner air. Is that concept too difficult for you to understand?

    • danemania001
      danemania001 Год назад +6

      just listen. when you are ascending at a slower speed yes their is still heat being generated from air resistance but you aren't traveling newly as fast as it does descending. to maintain stable orbit they have to Tavel 14 times faster then when they were leaving the atmosphere. the only way for a shuttle to descend back down to earth is to just graze the atmosphere to bleed off excess momentum which is where you see the heat generated when re-entering the atmosphere

    • Nicholas Troiano
      Nicholas Troiano Год назад +2

      Do you know anything about flight dynamics?

  • Steven Sosebee
    Steven Sosebee Год назад

    Awesome !

  • ⵔⵓⴽⴰⵜⴽⴰⵜ
    ⵔⵓⴽⴰⵜⴽⴰⵜ Год назад +5

    Say no to partial thrust.

    • Chris Musix
      Chris Musix Год назад +6

      NASA rule #7: don't joke about fuel efficiency :P

    • ⵔⵓⴽⴰⵜⴽⴰⵜ
      ⵔⵓⴽⴰⵜⴽⴰⵜ Год назад +3

      +mac9805b I understand the concept of dynamic pressure and the destructive stresses it can cause. It was just a stupid joke. :D

    • mac9805b
      mac9805b Год назад +5

      +rock3tcat (ⵙⴰⵔⵓⵅ) A partial thrust profile on the main booster core from just before maximum dynamic pressure to MECO on the boosters in actually a really efficient way of flying a rocket like this. This leaves about 1 minute and 20 seconds of burn on the main core engine at full power after the boosters have jettisoned. This is important because the rocket is much lighter at this point and this 100 seconds provides a large change in the vehicle's velocity, that you wouldn't get if you ran the central core at 100% over the whole first stage profile.

  • 100SteveB
    100SteveB 2 года назад +5

    A much more sedate lift off compared to a shuttle launch, they used to leap off the pad. Big beasties are always slow to get moving.

    • mac9805b
      mac9805b Год назад

      High thrust, yes. But also high weight and very low fuel efficiency. Liquid fuel rockets are MUCH more efficient.

    • nutsackmania
      nutsackmania Год назад

      Shuttle SRBs make a lotta thrust. And SRBs help a lot with payload capacity--are you kidding? Have you read about the proposed five-segment booster upgrade for STS? 20,000 more lbs to the ISS. They are the cheapest way to make that much thrust at sea level.

    • mac9805b
      mac9805b Год назад

      +100SteveB Indeed. The liftoff is similar to other liquid fueled first stage rockets, though. Solids on the Space Shuttle / SLS help / will help with getting off the pad quickly but contribute little to the payload capacity due to their low Isp and high dry mass.

  • Dean Borchert
    Dean Borchert 2 года назад

    I'm 65 and NASA is still doing the same old things as when I was a teenager.........A new era of American space exploration?
    They wasted my generation's space legacy...now they have a whole new generation to screw.

    • SlyBlueCat
      SlyBlueCat Год назад

      Yes, NASA is still using rockets to reach orbit because there is no better method atm. The same reason why cars still use wheels

    • pbmdh
      pbmdh Год назад

      Because the only reason we went to the moon was politics and the fear of communism. There is absolutely no drive like that pushing us to do anything even remotely like that again. It's sad that we need some external drive apart from the amazing knowledge, and technological advances, we would experience. Imagine where we would be if the budget of NASA was like it was back in the 60's ?

    • 45445 Angels
      45445 Angels Год назад

      be nice

    • Loaf Man
      Loaf Man Год назад +3

      Well if they reach the 2030 deadline, we won't be entirely screwed. But you're right, we should already be on Mars. It's like NASA took a pause in tech advancement and only just started moving forward again. Very little if at all.

    • Dean Borchert
      Dean Borchert Год назад

      I'm working on it.

  • Aliyu Ahmed
    Aliyu Ahmed 2 года назад +19

    Kerbal Space Problem :D

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      Says the loser who couldn't get a job as a NASA janitor.

    • Aliyu Ahmed
      Aliyu Ahmed Год назад

      its a typo.... :D

  • Dalton Morgan
    Dalton Morgan 2 года назад +6

    When faced with defeat and humiliation first instinct of russian trolls is to try claiming "fake"

    • Mike Paulk
      Mike Paulk Год назад

      Windows ain't gonna lick themselves, someone's gotta be a dumbass and think everything is fake

    • Rubertoe
      Rubertoe Год назад

      +Dalton Morgan Well, I think you wouldn't want that as an answer about the STS or Saturn V...

    • Dalton Morgan
      Dalton Morgan Год назад

      +Rubertoe Cool story comrade

    • Rubertoe
      Rubertoe Год назад

      +Shlomo2 It can be treated seriously considering they developed and flew (sadly, only twice) a succesful launch vehicle family with much greater capabilities than those of SLS: Energia.

    • Shlomo2
      Shlomo2 Год назад

      +Dalton Morgan well i am a gigantic supporter of space just sls seems like a horribly expensive ride.Russians can again be treated seriously if they develop a soyuz replacement+angara instead of relics like proton that they fly and reach the moon 50+ years late.

  • Hot Communist A-10 Warthog
    Hot Communist A-10 Warthog 2 года назад +41

    I cant wait to see the Falcon Heavy just destroy this and the Orion

    • grog3514
      grog3514 2 месяца назад

      And BFR will be more powerful than all of them. I bet it will launch before the SLS too. Its a pointless program and should be cancelled.

    • electrodium
      electrodium 9 месяцев назад +1

      Spot on, Krix.

    • Kris Matriciani
      Kris Matriciani 11 месяцев назад +5

      Yeah actually the worst. I love SpaceX, and literally anything else that has something to do with space exploration or whatever. No idea why these kids now have to act like a bunch of twats.

    • static79
      static79 11 месяцев назад +6

      You fanboys are the worst.

    • RealityIsTheNow
      RealityIsTheNow Год назад +7

      I don't want anything destroyed. Orion is a deep space exploration ship. Sounds like something I'd like to have around.

  • Ryan Goldbacher
    Ryan Goldbacher 2 года назад

    Why do they have to say stupid stuff at liftoff. What happened to just LIFT OFF

  • George Mayerhofer
    George Mayerhofer 2 года назад

    THIS IS PURE GARBAGE. ALL CGI COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGERY. ALL LIES. THE EARTH IS FLAT. THESE GUYS ARE STRUGGLING TO KEEP THE WORLD ASLEEP. NO ONE CAN PENETRATE THE VAULT OF THE DOME. MAN KIND IS RESTRICTED TO THE LAND CALLED EARTH. THERE IS NO MARS MISSION. IT IS ALL A SCAM. DON'T BELIEVE THIS BULL SHIT. DO YOU HOME WORK. YOU WILL LEARN OF THE GREAT DECEPTION IN THE LAST DAYS OF THE TEACHING THAT THE EARTH IS ROUND. THEY WANT YOU TO BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION AND NOT CREATION. THE BIBLE SAYS THE EARTH IS FLAT. WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!THE TELEMETRY OF THE EARTH IN THE GLOBE VIEW IS C.G.I. C.G.I. C.G.I. C.G.I. !!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Lee Lankford
      Lee Lankford 4 месяца назад

      George Mayerhofer you sir are a complete idiot, no parts missing

    • electrodium
      electrodium Год назад +1

      Go outside, George. Get some fresh air, reevaluate your life, get a job... we're worried about you, George.

    • Shenzhou
      Shenzhou 2 года назад +4

      Take some time off of the internet, George. You're becoming delusional.

    • DukeOfNowhere
      DukeOfNowhere 2 года назад +6

      +George Mayerhofer Turn you caps lock off and take your ADHD medication, George.

  • CountArtha
    CountArtha 2 года назад +43

    Nine years from the first test launch to the first manned mission, with probably more delays in the future. JFK must be spinning in his grave.

    • CountArtha
      CountArtha Год назад

      +Universe
      Holy cow, I have _superpowers_?

    • Universe
      Universe Год назад +1

      White people are the explorers of this world. What else would you expect to happen with the population percentage dropping like a rock?

    • Chris Musix
      Chris Musix Год назад

      Slow and steady is ok. Safer and more economical.

    • xc5647321 xc5647321
      xc5647321 xc5647321 Год назад

      Agreed!

    • dponzi56
      dponzi56 Год назад +5

      +CountArtha Oh, and BTW, don't blame NASA, blame congress. Every time NASA has come up with a new manned space project, congress has cut it. Thats why Apollos 18, 19 and 20 were cut and the Apollo applications project was cut. Thats why the Space Shuttle took so long (because of the military upgrades that congress was catering to).That's why it took over 10 years just to get the space station started. The Constellation project was axed after 4 years. Its not NASA, its congress ALWAYS.

  • sparkdog44
    sparkdog44 2 года назад

    Do those jettisoned panels splash down in the ocean?

    • DukeOfNowhere
      DukeOfNowhere 2 года назад

      +sparkdog44 No, they burn up re-entering the lower atmosphere.

  • Anri Orlow
    Anri Orlow 2 года назад +1

    This rocket is extremely ugly! :|

    • Golden Retriever
      Golden Retriever Год назад +1

      Anri Orlow
      Well it's not designed to win beauty competitions it's designed to go into space

    • iloveteaalot
      iloveteaalot Год назад

      Like the engineers give a shit ;)

    • Aerohk
      Aerohk 2 года назад +7

      +Anri Orlow Lemme guess, anything other than the Falcons are ugly to you, am I right..?

    • CIA
      CIA 2 года назад +5

      Um... I don't think they care too much on "looks" I'm pretty sure it has to do with "performance". But I don't think they're using this design when people go up, I'm unsure.

  • MaloGaming Extra
    MaloGaming Extra 2 года назад +2

    help me!!!!! flat earthers is trying to brainwash me!

    • Henji96
      Henji96 2 года назад

      +MaloGaming Extra if you are that easily manipulated you must be very dumb

    • CountArtha
      CountArtha 2 года назад

      +MaloGaming Extra Remove the head; destroy the brain. Oh, wait . . . . That's zombies, never mind.

    • Wyatt Tremain
      Wyatt Tremain 2 года назад

      Do not listen to their incompetent minds sir!

  • bob bobo
    bob bobo 2 года назад +2

    Im hopin Orion will be in GTA6:P

  • Michal Zwirek
    Michal Zwirek 2 года назад +1

    This is NOT a way forward. Orion is going to be another dead end of the space program.It is not a significant leap forward in any way.It uses expendable and costly launch vehicle.Delta 4 Heavy cost $375million per launch+you have cost of Orion itself.How many such flights can NASA afford per year?They are very conservative in their thinking.Trying to solve tomorrow's challenges with yesterday's methods.It is a bit like at the end of the 19th century they faced a problem of inefficient and slow individual transport mostly done by horse-drawn carriages.They could have "improved" it by let's say making lighter carriages or putting pneumatic tyres on them or they could make a big and bold move and invent cars...So which way was better?...There is a British company working on Skylon(a rocket plane with air breathing engines).If they succeed the cost per launch will drop to $5million.Even $10 million would be a revolution in space exploration.The Moon and Mars would be truly within our reach. Orion with its cost and 60 years old concept of delivering cargo to orbit is going nowhere. We will keep on dreaming about Mars for another 20 -30 years. Dream on, dream on........

    • Henji96
      Henji96 Год назад

      BO isn't going to send anything into orbit. All they do is go up and down, which is ideal when their goal is to let people experience microgravity and see the view.

    • Jesus Ramirez Romo
      Jesus Ramirez Romo Год назад +3

      +J Dean blue origin isnt an ssto, its a suborbital rocket that ill only be in space for literally 5 minutes

    • Henji96
      Henji96 2 года назад

      +Michal Zwirek the falcon heavy is 90 mil for 54t to leo

    • J Dean
      J Dean 2 года назад +2

      +Michal Zwirek :To add to EnDSchultz1s excellent analysis, just look at the SLS/Orion test schedule and NASAs budget history. Neither would accommodate anything beyond substantial LEO ops if even that. The SLS test schedule calls for the next test in late 2018 or about 4 years after the first test shown in the video. The entire Apollo program was conducted in just 5 years from the first Saturn-V all up test launch. NASA's last record budget was half a century ago. Other major government agencies have posted record budgets within the past decade or so. Todays NASA budget is the same as it was in 1960 as a percentage of fed spending. We won't be going to Mars anytime within the next two decades on budgets like that. It also shows how interested most of the public really is regarding spaceflight. The private sector startups are only beginning to really realize how difficult and expensive space is. Space X has been the most conservative, and smart enough to also land NASA cargo contracts. Blue Origins might have the solution to low cost spaceflight in it's SSTO but only time will tell if that's accurate and so far, it's taking more time than any of the startups were prepared for. Way more time.

  • MurphMonkey
    MurphMonkey 2 года назад

    so they used millions of dollars just for a test. and the starving ppl in Africa said.....

    • Aerohk
      Aerohk 2 года назад +2

      +MurphMonkey NASA's mission is to inspire people to do great things, which indirectly make the nation richer.

    • J Dean
      J Dean 2 года назад

      +MurphMonkey :The national debt could buy around 1,000 NASAs! Seems you should be complaining about that because that's getting in the way of feeding starving Ppl right here in America. If we can't feed many Americans, how do we feed Africa?

    • 4Gamers00
      4Gamers00 2 года назад +3

      +MurphMonkey Nasa has an annual budget of about 16 billion USD ... the military budget of the US is around 600 billion USD, so dont blame exploration and science for starving people, blame the god damn wars and military!

    • Chris Beard
      Chris Beard 2 года назад +3

      +MurphMonkey Screw Africa! People starve and homeless veterans die every day right here in America!

  • Izio Shaba
    Izio Shaba 2 года назад

    screw governmental space flight. they couldnt interest the public to save their life.

    • Izio Shaba
      Izio Shaba 2 года назад

      nasa sucks, too political, not relatable at all

    • Izio Shaba
      Izio Shaba 2 года назад

      and everytime the first stage falcon tries to land you cant believe your fucking eyes. but the nasa EVA suits have had the same design for four decades, so i guess you're right

    • Russell S
      Russell S 2 года назад

      +Izio Shaba Hmmm. When the NASA astros leave here next year aboard Atlas V for the ISS, we will have crowds of nearly half a million people outside Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. And the year after, when the first SLS flies from KSC on a trip around the Moon, there will be nearly one million people here to watch that launch. Save your own life.

  • The Reflection
    The Reflection 2 года назад

    It's amazing how you sheep believe this nonsense. The lift off is undoubtedly real, but the moment the craft reaches a certain point and the rocket's "go pro" camera takes over looking downward, it is all CGI based. They can make anything they want happen after that point. In the coming years they will send a bunch of "courageous" men and women to Mars, and it will all be filmed on earth. How gullible people are.

    • Lee Lankford
      Lee Lankford 2 месяца назад

      The Reflection its alot sadder that you don't believe in anything, walking through life thinking nothings real except your phone and Facebook, whos gullible??

    • Lee Lankford
      Lee Lankford 2 месяца назад

      The Reflection how else are they supposed to film it smart guy?? Your smarter than everyone so fill us sheep in lol

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      Well if you really think so, then start a go fund me account, get your own camera with your own lenses, and pay to have it pointed in your orientation. How much is in your piggy bank?

    • Lee Lankford
      Lee Lankford 4 месяца назад

      The Reflection you sir are a complete idiot, no parts missing, get off here you don't belong

    • J Dean
      J Dean 2 года назад +1

      +Xiao Sheng :Assuming your not a troll, and since you are so wise, can you explain how the U.S. Russia, China, the UK, France and possibly Israel can have ICBMs which were the basis for our pre Apollo launch vehicles? Can you explain at what point the rockets stop and where do they go if not to space? Or why we couldn't get rockets to orbit if we can reach your magical certain point? Can you explain how we launched the shuttle (Which did a complex 120 degree roll maneuver clearing the tower) and where 135 of them went if not to space? Can you explain how space photography was done pre CGI? Can you explain what amateur astronomers the world over are photographing through telescopes if not ISS? Or are you yet another who would just claim something you don't understand is CGI? Seems to me gullible people are the ones who swallow the "No stars" and other arguments so often bandied about by space fakers. BTW, who are "They?".

  • SpysL1KEus
    SpysL1KEus 2 года назад +2

    THIS IS A HOAX!!! THIS IS BULLSHIT!!! IT'S ALL FAKE!!!

    • J Dean
      J Dean 2 года назад +3

      +SpysL1KEus:Assuming your not a troll, and since you too are so wise, can you explain how the U.S. Russia, China, the UK, France and possibly Israel can have ICBMs which were the basis for our pre Apollo launch vehicles? Can you explain at what point the rockets stop and where do they go if not to space? Or why we couldn't get rockets to orbit if we can reach your magical certain point? Can you explain how we launched the shuttle (Which did a complex 120 degree roll maneuver clearing the tower) and where 135 of them went if not to space? Can you explain how space photography was done pre CGI? Can you explain what amateur astronomers the world over are photographing through telescopes if not ISS? Or are you yet another who would just claim something you don't understand is CGI? Seems to me gullible people are the ones who swallow the "No stars" and other arguments so often bandied about by space fakers. BTW, why the caps?

    • kevin bakker
      kevin bakker 2 года назад

      oki

  • Hercules Gordillo
    Hercules Gordillo 2 года назад

    aleksey krushovski your a stupid ass motherfucker

  • Bill Malcolm
    Bill Malcolm 2 года назад +2

    What's up with the image at 1:08? The rocket doesn't look real, like it's just a 2D image. If it is real, how was this view captured?

    • beaconrider
      beaconrider 2 месяца назад

      There are little snippets like this throughout the video, because they want to show you something that no camera is in position to see. You think they are faking it because they did that?

    • fleafrier1
      fleafrier1 Год назад +2

      It's not real but it sure would be cool if it were. I wish NASA had enough funding to send up an outside camera rocket along side every launch. Wouldn't that be some great video?

    • Bill Malcolm
      Bill Malcolm 2 года назад

      +Henji96 sarcasm, it's a thing!

    • Henji96
      Henji96 2 года назад

      +Bill Malcolm go away idiot.

    • Bill Malcolm
      Bill Malcolm 2 года назад +3

      +donnieb I wasn't sure what it was; hence why I asked. Just be glad I didn't start calling this video a hoax perpetrated by Big Globe

  • AK-87
    AK-87 2 года назад

    wow sorry for the curve of the Horizon it s a "bug":D :D :D :D :D :D How dumb can you be to be American :D :D :D :D

  • AK-87
    AK-87 2 года назад

    Well the earth is flat according to the American`s !!!! HOW CAN U NOT LOVE SUCH DEBILS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • xc5647321 xc5647321
      xc5647321 xc5647321 Год назад

      The Nibiru cataclysm is a supposed disastrous encounter between the Earth and a large planetary object (either a collision or a near-miss) which certain groups believe will take place in the early 21st century. Believers in this doomsday event usually refer to this object as Planet X or Nibiru. The idea that a planet-sized object will collide with or closely pass by Earth in the near future is not supported by any scientific evidence and has been rejected as pseudoscience and an internet hoax by astronomers and planetary scientists.[2][3]The idea was first put forward in 1995 by Nancy Lieder,[4][5] founder of the website ZetaTalk. Lieder describes herself as a contactee with the ability to receive messages from extraterrestrials from the Zeta Reticuli star system through an implant in her brain. She states that she was chosen to warn mankind that the object would sweep through the inner Solar System in May 2003 (though that date was later postponed) causing Earth to undergo a physical pole shift that would destroy most of humanity.[6] The prediction has subsequently spread beyond Lieder's website and has been embraced by numerous Internet doomsday groups, most of which linked the event to the 2012 phenomenon. Since 2012, the Nibiru cataclysm has frequently reappeared in the popular media; usually linked to newsmaking astronomical objects such as Comet ISON or Planet Nine. Although the name "Nibiru" is derived from the works of the ancient astronaut writer Zecharia Sitchin and his interpretations of Babylonian and Sumerian mythology, he denied any connection between his work and various claims of a coming apocalypse.

    • AK-87
      AK-87 2 года назад

      +John Masters And what is Nibiru ??????

    • AK-87
      AK-87 2 года назад

      +John Masters Well I haven't met a person that is thinkin like that here in Europe

    • AK-87
      AK-87 2 года назад

      Well exept the turds ups turks
      cuz they live in the medieval ages with their muslim crap

  • Robert Willis
    Robert Willis 2 года назад

    Orion is an obscenity. It's purpose is not to transport people into space. It's purpose is to transport tens of billions of taxpayers dollars into the gaping maw of Lockheed Martin. There is nothing that Orion can do that Dragon V2 cannot do at a fraction of the cost. Both Soyuz & Shenzhou are markedly superior designs.

    • Robert Willis
      Robert Willis 2 года назад

      +KersZZ NASA is still making Orion due to corrupt pork barrel politics.

    • KersZZ
      KersZZ 2 года назад +1

      True. I don't know why Nasa is still making Orion. SpaceX is an official partner of Nasa, they aren't enemies. Nasa should accept that someone else does it better.

  • MrFriendly B
    MrFriendly B 2 года назад +19

    "The first step to Mars", what a joke !

    • Tai Perette
      Tai Perette 23 дня назад

      SpaceX is far superior when it comes to rockets themsleves. Of course NASA far more experienced, but SpaceX is definitely closer to Mars than any other company or agency.

    • xc5647321 xc5647321
      xc5647321 xc5647321 Месяц назад

      Cannot let ONE setback stop you other wise we need to stop using planes, trains and automobiles! We crash those things all of the time and still dont stop.

    • Illuminati Recruiter
      Illuminati Recruiter 2 месяца назад

      What's your point Einstein?

    • Thomas Wijgerse
      Thomas Wijgerse 3 месяца назад

      ahem, the n1 was way before we had the software we have today, a lot of engines today is childsplay.
      also, the reason the falcon heavy is too late is actually a very good thing. Its because the falcon 9 has been improving in power to a point where they kept on having to redesign the falcon heavy to deal with the increased acoustics.

    • Thomas Wijgerse
      Thomas Wijgerse 3 месяца назад

      falcon heavy is superior than any rocket operational today, and when sls gets its first launch, I bet spacex has its bfr up and running which is more powerful and at a fraction of the cost, also a lot of engine has changed from being a drawback to an advantage.

  • cp arquit
    cp arquit 2 года назад

    slowly reach Russian

  • leokimvideo
    leokimvideo 2 года назад +42

    makes the spaceX rocket look like a toy, gotta love the heavy lift rockets

    • xXxSnoopdawgxXx
      xXxSnoopdawgxXx 18 дней назад

      By a factor of 2 the falcon heavy is now the most powerful rocket in the world (currently)

    • mracer
      mracer Месяц назад +3

      This comment has not aged well.

    • Callum Griffiths
      Callum Griffiths Месяц назад

      Replying to a 2+ year old comment, nice.

    • 111jazza111
      111jazza111 2 месяца назад +2

      Not anymore.

    • Andy McAdam
      Andy McAdam 2 месяца назад +1

      true, but remember nasa don't actually build anything, SLS is being built by Lockheed Martin, and it's not even due to do an unmanned lunar orbit until late 2019, by then SpaceX will have flown falcon heavy many times and performed several lunar orbits.

  • [GD] FazeXtyLLe
    [GD] FazeXtyLLe 2 года назад

    Good Job,USS Anchorage. For saving our spaceship,ORION.