🌀INCREDIBLE!! Epic Awesome NEW Voigtlander lens! 40mm f1.2 NOKTON 🌀

Share
Embed
  • Published on Mar 10, 2018
  • 🌀INCREDIBLE!! Epic Awesome NEW Voigtlander lens! 40mm f1.2 NOKTON 🌀
    shop.cameraquest.com/voigtlander-leica-mount-lenses/voigtlander-40mm-f/1.2-vm-mount/
    www.flickr.com/groups/4162920@N21/pool/
    IF YOU LIKE THESE VIDEOS, YOU CAN MAKE A SMALL DONATION VIA PAYPAL LINK HERE: www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=BDZ3G8SJ4ABT4
    (paypal email: kenw111@insightbb.com)
    Join me on INSTAGRAM at: officialangryphotographer

Comments • 184

  • civicdz
    civicdz 4 days ago

    what's better between Fujifilm 50mm f2 and the voigtlander 58mm? thanks

  • doblebo
    doblebo 14 days ago +1

    great lens, but i'm honestly more floored by the 21mm f1.8 ultron which you recommended. probably more of a subjective thing due to the focal length. the voigtlander 50mm f1.5 nokton aspherical is also up there with this one imo. all of these lenses put my other ones forever in hibernation never to see the light of day - goes without saying... but my point is that i think we're all eager for an updated voigtlander lens comparison/review from you that puts them all in perspective

  • MayaBee Jakubowska
    MayaBee Jakubowska 3 months ago

    I love your reviews Man !! And the Unicorns too hashaha , very much so

  • Antonio Taylor
    Antonio Taylor 4 months ago

    For the adapter, a M mount for my fuji x mount camera (xt10 and xt20)? Thanks in advance...

  • ex0ja
    ex0ja 5 months ago

    This or the Mitakon 35?

  • mougabo
    mougabo 6 months ago

    can´t decided between this and the ultron 35mm f1.7... help!!!!!

  • Lance Dwight
    Lance Dwight 6 months ago

    Was this made for the FX mount in addition to the M mount?

  • Thomas James
    Thomas James 6 months ago

    I know they’re different lenses but out of Fuji 56mm f1.2, Mitakon 35mm f0.95 and Voitglander 40mm f1.2 for x-pro 2 which renders better?

  • mika2oo1
    mika2oo1 7 months ago +1

    I wish you would stop yapping about how good the lenses are and just showed some damn sample pictures you took and why you like them so much. Such faggety idiotic presentation.

  • Eddie Sanchez
    Eddie Sanchez 7 months ago +1

    I want to have sex it with right now...hahaha

  • Advokat Motret
    Advokat Motret 7 months ago

    how about 13 December 2013 lens? Now ibelux 40mm f/0.85 mark 2
    petapixel.com/2013/12/13/announcing-ibelux-40mm-f0-85-fastest-mirrorless-camera-lens-world

  • Muhammad Khizar
    Muhammad Khizar 8 months ago

    Will buy it for my Sony. I only trust you and steve Huff for a best recommendation.

  • Robertw
    Robertw 8 months ago

    Thought you said the voigt 28 was second to the 58 not the 40?

  • Pablo Sol
    Pablo Sol 8 months ago

    is the Sony version the same?

  • Fletch Fay
    Fletch Fay 9 months ago

    I’m struggling between this lens and the 1.4 rangefinder version haha any recommendation? Or any issues with the rf one I’m not aware of? I appreciate you man :)

    • critao23
      critao23 Month ago

      Fletch Fay i was in the same position & just ended up getting both. The 1.4 is more vintage leica rendering, the 1.2 is just insane. Literally insane. Its incredibly sharp & amazingly built.

  • Achilleas Labrou
    Achilleas Labrou 10 months ago +1

    The are many great manual focus lenses for e-mount. Just check Wikipedia for: List of third-party E-mount lenses

  • mougabo
    mougabo 10 months ago +3

    anyone ever told you , you look like the happy buddha?

  • Dennis Humbla
    Dennis Humbla 10 months ago

    How Is the 40mm Nokton Classic 1.4, Is It also that sexy? 😊

  • Sabbir S
    Sabbir S 10 months ago +1

    Hi, I'm planning to either buy this or the 1.4 lens for my XT3, would you say there's a huge difference at low light performance?

  • Tami L Howard
    Tami L Howard 11 months ago +2

    I like this lens better than the Mitakon 35mm 0.95.

  • Robertw
    Robertw 11 months ago +1

    I bought your 3 voigtlander recommendations really appreciate your feedback on close up I received with 40 voigtlander what the hell is this , need help ken, these 3 do look at a quality level beyond all the nikon must haves I bought they all great quality but the voigtlanders look special as you said

  • Robertw
    Robertw 11 months ago

    Ken question I bought 3 of the voigtlander you recommended the 40 came with a close up filter maybe not referred to a filter I was surprised and as a novice does this make it a closer focus like a macro and came with a tiny hood not like a typical hood screws on but wrong direction your biggest fan a bit lost on the ad ons the 40 is small like the pancake nikons

  • Robertw
    Robertw 11 months ago

    I think you said the 20 and 28 voigtlander not being made anymore I have 20 and 58 is 28 the one to get because of discontinuing making or get the 40 you strongly recommend?

  • Om Arsu
    Om Arsu Year ago

    I tried this lens 2 weeks ago with Sony A7II, I got same conclusion as you... within few shots you can see and feel it is a real winner. looking to buy it second hand mint condition

    • Om Arsu
      Om Arsu Year ago

      I ended up buying this with E mount.. waiting for delivery in few days

  • Ceri Rust
    Ceri Rust Year ago

    What an irritating prick

  • mehran arabpour
    mehran arabpour Year ago

    So your final verdict, is this lens amazing? LOL

  • Joe Ll
    Joe Ll Year ago +1

    @TheoriaApophasis real question sir... If you HAD to pick one over the other. Voigtlander 40mm 1.2 or Voigtlander 50mm 1.2?? I know you HIGHLY praised the 40mm, but also said the 50mm 1.2 is the BEST 50mm?

  • W. Scholz
    W. Scholz Year ago

    Lenses like that give you very different results in combination with different cameras and sensors.
    I have just testet the differences between Sony A7 r III / Leica M.

  • David Moreno Belmonte

    @Theoria Apophasis In between Voigtlander 40mm f1.2 NOKTON vs Voigtlander 35mm f1.4 NOKTON vs Voigtlander 35mm f1.2 NOKTON ASP II? which one? not money issues here, compared in terms of sharpness, color, render etc....

    • David Moreno Belmonte
      David Moreno Belmonte Year ago

      @Theoria Apophasis ok noted with many thanks. Now...
      1. Voigtlander 40mm f1.2 NOKTON vs Zeiss Distagon 35mm f2?
      2. Voigtlander 50mm f1.2 NOKTON vs Contax Zeiss 50mm f1.4 MMJ?
      3. And what do you think of Voigtlander 25mm f0.95 NOKTON??? can't find a re view from you.

      Thousands of thanks man!

    • Theoria Apophasis
      Theoria Apophasis  Year ago

      eassssssy, the 40mm

  • Peter Miller
    Peter Miller Year ago

    This is a little off the wall, but I recently had an opportunity to shoot the Canon 50 mm F1/2 R lens on the Canon R mirrorless camera. As someome who has been shooting fast 50'S for 40 years-this one rocked me. You shoould check it out if you have an opportunity.

  • Nate Swapp
    Nate Swapp Year ago

    I became a little nervous when you blew on the lens, I just tell myself; he only blew on the outside of the lens. Right!?

  • Chris Zamora
    Chris Zamora Year ago

    This IS one of the best lenses I have ever shot with.. It's a ridiculously beautiful lens that makes me happy every time I use it.

  • Achilleas Labrou
    Achilleas Labrou Year ago +3

    The full frame manual voigtlander 40mm f/1.2 will be available for e-mount too. It will offer auto focus magnification, aperture reporting, compatible with the inside stabilization and full exif tag for later auto lens correction with Lightroom.

  • abhijit bapat
    abhijit bapat Year ago

    Sir can I use this lens with my Nikon d7200?

    • abhijit bapat
      abhijit bapat Year ago

      Sir I already have voigtlander 58mm f1.4 as you recommended. Such a beautiful lens. Please tell me is it possible for me to use this lens on my Nikon d7200?

  • Kook Kim
    Kook Kim Year ago +3

    What do you think of 35mm f1.2 vs 40mm f1.2?

  • KEN
    KEN Year ago +1

    I have a stupid question. It’s an M mount lens that you adapted to test on a Fuji. If I was going to buy this lens to use with a Leica, can I take your review as it is? Meaning whatever the pros and cons will still be valid if I use these lens on a Leica M?

    • Theoria Apophasis
      Theoria Apophasis  Year ago

      of course, tons of leica peeps have already bought the 50mm 1.2

  • Manuel Odabashian
    Manuel Odabashian Year ago +1

    How do you compare the look of voightlander with other lenses?

  • Gustavo Ibarra
    Gustavo Ibarra Year ago +1

    Indeed, as soon as you go 1.4, bye bye rounded "bolas", I got the 7 artisan 50 mm 1.1 (yes, sorry for that) and isn't sharp, corner, bla bla bla,...but....from 1.2 and up always keep rounded bolas. The question is, the 50 mm 1.2, work in the same manner? or keep the bokeh constantly rounded? Please a test about that.

  • Tristan Linke
    Tristan Linke Year ago

    Hey, what are your thoughts on the Voigtlander 110mm F/2.5?

  • A R
    A R Year ago

    Focus throw is insanly (!) short on this lens in the "mid-range" 2m-10m. Nobody criticizes this (but me).
    When focustravel/throw is above-average long : than it is usually, -in most reviews wanting to be serious- praised a lot.! It is for sure not normal to never point this out this truely odd, rare particularity of this lens in this respect (at f1.2 of even more questonable impact!!)
    I find it equally strange that nobody ever questions wether it would have been advantuous Voightlander had (simply?) implemented rounded insread of strait blades... Is this à stupid remark?
    ( Also hardly ever mentioned : Resoults do need chromatic aberation correction - witch however can work verry well.).
    Just odd nobody ever comes up with these points.

  • Grissana Takeyama

    How is this lens compare to 35mm f1.2 Nokton ASPH version 2?

  • Luckylucyliu
    Luckylucyliu Year ago

    Which would you prefer? The Voigtlander 40mm f1.2 $899.00 or the Zeiss Milvus 35mm f2 on sale 200.00 off at 970.00
    No licking please!

  • Brian Eliel
    Brian Eliel Year ago

    How do you like this vs 35mm f1.7 ultron?

  • Tyrone So
    Tyrone So Year ago

    In terms of all the epic qualities you mentioned, what ranks higher this or the Fujinon 16mm f1.4 as a manual focus lens on the x-mount?

    • Tyrone So
      Tyrone So Year ago

      I understand that I won't get highlights with the Voit.

    • Tyrone So
      Tyrone So Year ago

      Fair enough. Might I throw this in instead? MITAKON 35mm f0.95 I'm trying to decide on manual lens for my x-h1. Having fun with the focus highlighting right now. Price isn't a factor I consider between the two, if one is just that much better, it's worth it to me.

    • Theoria Apophasis
      Theoria Apophasis  Year ago

      those are 2 radically diff lenses.......both are incredible in their own way

  • Stumpycat Vm
    Stumpycat Vm Year ago

    mine doesn't say Aspherical on the lens front, like on the stock photos, but is says it on the box, excuse the word "box"

  • Ibrahim Ziazadeh
    Ibrahim Ziazadeh Year ago

    Thanks for the review. How do I mount this lens on a full-frame canon eos?
    Is this lens or the voigtlander 40mm f2 ultron SL II-S better?

  • Ibrahim Ziazadeh
    Ibrahim Ziazadeh Year ago

    Which other 40mm lens are among the best in terms of color rendition and pop effect (closest to the zeiss distagon series)? I intend to use the 40mm on a fullframe canon dslr (5D mark iii). I don't like the canon 40mm f2.8 STM.

  • Chris Lawrence
    Chris Lawrence Year ago

    7:51... kinda spit out my tea all over myself. officially the only person who makes me laugh during a legit af lens review. TOUGHER. THAN. WOODPECKER.. you know the rest.

  • stumpycat VM
    stumpycat VM Year ago +2

    almost got the voit 58mm, when i saw the 1.2 40mm fkicker posts i ordered it fm thousandoaks CA cameraquest, overnite shipping no-charge, my only issue is how to do a 1.2 lens justice, i bought a 6 stop NG filter, because I only want to shoot this wide open

    • stumpycat VM
      stumpycat VM Year ago

      Theoria Apophasis bought the rayqual adaptor to fuji, i think im only losing mabey a third of the edge of this lens, to the crop

    • Theoria Apophasis
      Theoria Apophasis  Year ago +2

      hehehehehe!!!!!!!

  • Glenn Blaszkiewicz

    Ken, just based on performance (not worrying about cost or lack of AF) how would you compare this to a native Fuji lens such as the 35mm f1.4? I have never tried an adapted lens on Fuji yet.

  • Pablo Moraes
    Pablo Moraes Year ago

    The big questions is ..........
    $999 for the Voigtlander 40mm 1.2
    $800 for the Zeiss 35mm 1.4 (wich u told is your BEST lens)
    $300 for the Nikkor 35mm 2.0 (Your budget best 35 Recom) ????????????????
    wich one really worth the money ?

    • Pablo Moraes
      Pablo Moraes Year ago

      Maaaan that's the lens ! but ..... I'm looking for something small and portable ! the Zeiss is a beast !

    • Theoria Apophasis
      Theoria Apophasis  Year ago

      $600 used zeiss distagon 35mm f2

  • James Meterissian

    I heard this lens suffers from focus shift, is this true? That's kinda an issue when you're shooting it on a rangefinder, any thoughts ?

  • dovah strings
    dovah strings Year ago

    love the sound the aperture rings makes heehee

  • Shu Yuan Ho
    Shu Yuan Ho Year ago

    How about the 58mm F1.4?

  • PrincipiaMathematica
    PrincipiaMathematica Year ago +11

    I never comment on anything, but this bloke is right - I have the e-mount version and it’s the dog’s bollocks. A masterpiece. The one I’d grab to save in the event of a fire.

  • Chris Lawrence
    Chris Lawrence Year ago

    Woodpecker lips haha. That's great. Have two questions (sony e-mount focused); bit amateur in nature, but... QUESTION 1: How are they able to make a 40mm 1.2 this tiny compared to Sony's 50mm 1.4 G series lens - which is huge?! Is it because of the autofocus system? I mean this thing is beautiful. QUESTION 2: Do you think there's a big difference in image quality between getting the 40mm E mount version, or waiting to get the 50mm version which would require an adapter to e-mount? Thx for any advice you can give!

  • cxlos 66
    cxlos 66 Year ago

    Is it possible to adapt this on the GFX50s?

  • Scott McCullough
    Scott McCullough Year ago

    I bought this lens and rayqual adapter for my Fuji X Pro2. You are correct. This is an amazing lens. I have been making some amazing B&W photos with the Acros filim simulation. The contrast is amazing. I don't typically pixel peep, but I will spend several minutes pouring over the image on the screen in amazement. When I use this combination in bright sunlit conditions though, I notice that the image through the EVF is so dim that I can't see/use the focus peaking. Have you experienced this? Thanks for the great vids.

  • L Bredefeld
    L Bredefeld Year ago

    Ken if we use a Leica m to Nikon f adaptor will this lens loose everything except extreme macro?

  • Tomislav Miletić

    Theoria Apophasis Hmmm... Compared to Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm f/1.4 ?