Video size: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Show player controls
the movie is no more violent than any other violent movie The movie was boring
Some others have mentioned it in this comment section but you totally should review the 2018 Suspiria remake. I think it’s fantastic but it’s fairly divisive and I’d love to hear your thoughts on it.
Don't get rid of your grading system. Just change how you grade certain films.
You are the best film reviewer out there along with Perri Nemiroff, and I thank you for your work and love for your fans! Always gonna be Stuckmannized!
I really think yall are looking too far into this movie as a message or portrayal of the director.
It was a metaphor for the Western/American mindset. The House is the ideal society. Not easy to understand if you misapprehend the reality of the modern world (Read Chomsky). Also American entertainment has a preoccupation with serial killers and those kinds of things and this movie portrayed the real-life emotions of those themes.
Now this complete moron is shitting on a brilliant new film, rare and inspiring in the age of Marvel, because he predictably didn’t understand it in the slightest. The fact that this guy has so many followers makes Film’s future seem soulless and sad, and indicates a lowering of the bar for the term ‘critic’.
man kills women in film,misogyny sexism toxic blah blah.woman kills men in film,empowerment strong character oscar performance.why cant we kill them in movies but they can kill us,these are the times we are living in people
yeah see the movie is way too hard to watch stopped watching it part way through thats my veiw tho
One huge aspect of the film that I feel like many people have missed is the fact that it's also just Lars von Trier roasting himself for two and a half hours
Wrong actor for dirty bastard.
repetitive boring review the film is great
This was the most realistic serial killer movie and that's what I loved about it. It did not romanticize the killer but showed how fucked up he was in the head, how messy his actions were. Even supposed documentaries just demonize the killer to the point where he seems like evil incarnate but this movie even though it showed the "after life"/hell managed to avoid doing that
The movie sucked.
This Movie is defetively not for Americans. You need to know too many details about european art history.
This is a Movie about a SERIAL KILLER, IN A SERIAL KILLER LIFE THERE IS ALOT OF UNJUSTIFIED GORE AND HORROR, LARS SHOWED US REALITY, FREAKING GENIUS, PEOPLE CAN'T HANDLE HOW MUCH VIOLENCE LIFE CAN GET, PEOPLE ARE WHATS WRONG IN THE CINEMA INDUSTRY, THEY WANT A HAPPY ENDING, A BASIC SNOWFLAKE STROY, THAT S NOT WRONG, BUT IF THERE'S GOING TO BE FAKE LIFE SHITTY MOVIES THEN AT LEAST WE SHOULD RESPECT THE EXISTENCE OF PEOPLE LIKE LARS THAT FIGHT TO PORTRAIT REALITY, AND HIS EGO IS WELL PLACED, GOD DAMN IT IF I WAS HIM, I WOULDN'T SHUT UP ABOUT MYSELF OF HOW GREAT I AM, HOW SMART AND TALENTED, WATCHING THE HOUSE THAT JACK BUILD WAS A SPIRITUAL THING THAT RESTORED MY FAITH IN THE CINEMA INDUSTRY.
The house that jack build should be A++, and this form of art should be encouraged
Basically if ur a special snowflake who live in a wonderful world of puppies and candy, don't watch the movie
No one can handle how reality is violent, and lars shows us an uncut version of reality, so ofc people will be repulsed, his ego is well placed, when you deliver great art, and you're that unique, your ego is your biggest fan, lars is whats good in the cinema industry
you dont review a movie as bad because of it's violence level; you do it because it doesnt represent (or serve) to the story; being a movie about a serial killer detailed killings u expect (even more on a Lars Von Trier one) it to be VERY graphical; what is worth is thay you got a lesson in understanding the mind of a compulsive psycho; if you're going to critize this movie you should focus on the last 20 minutes which, as is the case with many Von Trier's movies, the reality is turned to a color collage with undefined psychodelic scenes (in this case themed around Hell, which as many interpretations as well) and if the movie should be that 2,5 hours long; to me it was a great movie, great acting and great directing
A movie can't be misogynistic. By that logic, phonebooth is a Misandristic movie. Phonebooth is a movie where a guy is treated like garbage .
I read that Von Trier said he was disappointed that “only” 100 people walked out. Sounds like Chris was right on the money about him being a reactionary filmmaker
the Lars Von Trier consumer knows exactly what's going to watch when he/she enters the theater; of course you can like it more or less but I, as a LVT follower, never walked out before the credits in any of his movies
You really need to stay away from Art House Cinema!!!! Stick with the schlock from Hollywood ala Super hero shitfests, and you'll be fine.
Politisch korrekt , schnarch .
Hay una gran diferencia entre reseñar un director y reseñar una película
So Is the uncut version available or did the censors just bury it?
I saw movie with wife. I should've known better.I could enjoy it. Unsettling at some parts. Long at some others. But overall it was enjoyable for me. Not for wife. She really really failed to stand film and I could perfectly understand why. That's not a movie for everyone.Her turning moment was the lake scene. Far more disturbing for her than the hunting incident.
Great points, but you should talk more about what you like and not only that you liked some parts of it! You say you like some parts of it, but doesn't say why. That is only half done film criticism. Please go full circle in the future!
Finally saw it. Got it in a very special blu-ray release. I don't know if I have the uncut version though.
One of his best.
I thought it was a decent movie right upto the silly Hell ending.
6:00 you did understand the whole movie is a biography, his controversive art and the way he justify his work, did you ? The narcissism is the colarbone of the movie. As always you comment a movie you did not understand...this is a very recurrent problem on your channel dude.
Boi, this time you do not even know what you are talking about.
If you approach the movie as "I'm going to watch a von tier movie" instead of "I'm going to watch a movie" of course you'll end with a review of lars von trier
2 young boys murdered The film is misogynistic!!!Symptoms of the times.
The thing that really pisses me off about Von Fleet is that he has no fucking idea how to actually write characters or dialog. He just replaces the characters' dialogue with his views on politics and what not.
U talk too much..
I loved the movie. It was put together perfectly. The ending was a bit hard to decipher but all in all it was a good film.
Enjoyed your thoughts.
chris grew up in a house
Oh my Gosh!!! Your TShirt!!! ❤️❤️❤️
People should stop using the word "misogyny".
Not one mention of The Inferno in this review? The House that Jack Built was derivative and cumbersome. But after watching this I want to give it another go.
The ending was uncomfortable to watch, it really feels of, i dont know if its the cinematography or the change of tone, but setting an allegory for dante's divine comedy at the end wasn't necessary, i think we all got the deal from the dialogues between incidents, it really didn't need to show you the trip on your face. I think it was great at depicting a depraved serial killer, as a character exploration, and it works as a philosophical essay as well. I don't find Hitler's shit particularly offensive, it's part of our history so it is, in fact, an icon, it was appropriate for the disertation they were having at the moment, and to show how depraved was Jack. At the end someone who considers killing is art would logically be drawn to love genocides as "extravagant artists" as he calls them. And Hitler was, of course, the genocide par excellence.
THAT SHIRT THO!!!!!!!!!!
Trier is a brilliant but extremely self centered provocateur - an artist of the highest order because he can make shit perfect but choose to brutally apply disruptive annoying cracks in the veneer so you wont get comfortable and forget about him and his latest Freudian slip:)
Just finished watching the film. Deep philosophical imagery and dialogue. Alot of Nietzsche philosophy coming through in the dialogue. Of course reference to Hilter, he followed Nietzsche philosophy.
I feel the same way about Aranofsky. At least the last few of them. He cares more about shocking and upsetting people than about telling stories that make much sense.
He was so close to a great film
Where can one purchase the unrated version?
Jack my favourite serial killer!
...sounds like bi-polar
I partly agree with your "Shoving his egotistical side into the movie" point. On one hand, it comes off as forced and kind of cringey. On the other, the whole point is that Jack is a pretentious douche himself who thinks he's an artistic genius, so Lars is in fact comparing himself to Jack in a mildly self aware manner. I can appreciate that on some level.
But what's the problem people have with this movie? Come on. I'm a horror fan. Been through Friday The 13th, Last House On The Left, Saw, Hostel, Maniac, The Hills Have Eyes, Cannibal Holocaust, you name it. Just because is a Lars Von Trier movie, it doens't mean it's not a horror movie. "THE HOUSE THAT JACK BUILT" is a brutal Slasher Flick. And as horror fans, we love Slashers! Ok, it's a little "Artsy" and all, but hey, still no difference. It's Lars, it's horror, it's slasher. And Honestly, there is nothing in this movie that other horror ones haven't showed us. Don't see why people would be upset or uncomfortable with this one after 8 Saw movies, 3 Hostels and a gigantic list of brutal and disgusting slashers. Seriously? "The house that Jack built"? Just another day at the beach for a horror fan. Aren't people just overthinking just because it's a Lars movie? Come on, Chris, I doubt you watch Friday The 13th and says "Ok, it's violent, but what does it mean? Why is the violence there? Just create reaction?" Hahahah Come on... Less is more, honey. Horror is Horror. Art is Art. And both can act together, or not...
I believe that Von Trier made this movie about himself, not to himself I think the way Jack sees his murders is the projection of how Von Trier sees his moviesEach film is a murder, each of Jack's dares with getting caught is each of Lars' dares with moviesSo inserting footage from his movies is more of an artistic choice than e bloated-ego oneThough the latter could, I suppose, in cases be the first, but I think that he was showing himself instead of showing off
I don't understand that "it was so gruesom I could not watch" it wasn't. All the violence was off screen and there were no really interesting ways of murder
@Jeric White I would love to hear why you disagree. I'm not joking, maybe i'm wrong.
BloodWork shut up.
@sashacosta Excactly! Thats what makes them so memorable. If the film was full of gruesome stuff than it wouldn't mean anything anymore, because then you are used to it. Showing less, but more brutal violence in a nuanced way and leaving some of it up to imagination makes it all the more disturbing. Brilliant filmmaking!
@BloodWork The unrated version contains literally less than a minute of extra footage, nothing more than a couple of shots.
Then you haven't seen the uncut version.
lol i like fucked up shit like The Bold The corrupt and The beautiful it makes me feel empty after watching them but i like that
I love Stuckmann. This is the kind of excellent review and film analyzing that I can count on him for.... he's the best.
Jennifer Davis i do like his opinion and personality
I really like this uncut cut. I really like super fucked up movies like A Serbian Film that are super duper difficult to sit through due to how utterly fucked up and disturbing it is. For me, The House Jack Built's my second most disturbing film because of a couple of scenes exclusive to the uncut version (if you've seen the uncut version, you know which two scenes I'm talking about...). Personally, I really enjoyed this film. I thought that it was great...The film's not even that gory. It's just really, really disturbing.Not all of his movies are super duper difficult to sit through, though. I mean the director's cut of Nymphomaniac has a graphic self-administered abortion scene, so I guess that is, but Melancholia is super tame and contains nothing really bad at all, even though it is mega depressing..."There are parts of this film designed to make you hate it."I hated no aspect of this movie whatsoever. I loved all of it. I thought that it was great...
Man... I was deeply touched by this film and i loved it, its not perfect but i dont agree with a lot of your criticisms, i saw meaning in things you said were essentially done for vanity. But its like theres nobody out there who sees what i see in it. It feels so lonely to feel passionately about something in a way that nobody agrees with you... Makes sense that Lars would be depressed...
violence those not need to be jutify sometimes, it just happened.
At least von trier is different
I felt like there were too many murder scenes and not enough Hell. Hell was very satisfying to watch. Jack was very satisfying to watch moving to Hell. His realizations and his refusal to accept that he had sinned. The fields of Elysium being so similar to his childhood and him shedding a tear gave me a lot to think about.
It's funny I found the icon sequence incredibly important. I found it saying we may 'celebrities' of our enemies. I only have to say Bundy, Manson or Oswald and you can tell me their first names.I also find it timely and, perhaps, we're learning. The psycho shooter in NZ recently (2019 March) has purposely not had his name mentioned in news I've read. We're avoiding the icon status.So in that regard I think Lars had a point, it wasn't self indulgent 100%.
Personally, I don't think the movie's gruesome and vile nature isn't to be taken literally. I'm pretty sure Lars Von Trier was emulating the book "Dante's The Inferno", with Jack symbolising (Dante) and Verge, the voice in his head, symbolising (Virgil) the philosophical poet that guides Dante through the circles of hell... Idk, if you aren't familiar with it, check it out. Might clarify the horror's in this movie.
the movie was way too long. he should have trimmed it down.
Not long enough for me
You’re a pussy this was the best movie ever
pu all disc for bin , disc past
I actually liked the self-referential aspects of the film, because I haven't seen that before. And I think that is the key to why it's difficult to rate, as the reviewer in his own words points out; there's simply no films to compare it to. I felt similar seeing for example Kubrick's 2001, or Tarkovsky's Solaris, or Lynch's Inland Empire. These types of films tread new ground and are difficult to place. So, hats off to von Trier for pushing the envelope, though I do agree that it's all-in-all a flawd achievement.
I honestly didn't think it was THAT gory or violent. Like...Hostel was WAY worse :-/
the best review of this movie on youtube. thanks! and very right comment about grading. Lars lives in his own world, and projecting his vision in a very different way.
I din't agree with the review of Nymphomaniac, which I still think is Von Trier's masterpiece, but this time I feel the same way about The House, it was a hit and miss experience. Maybe I should watch it again.
I agree the last few films of his are his best. Nymphomaniac well may be his masterpiece, but Melancholia and The House That Jack Built rank in the same league IMO. I will watch all again, but of his older films, particularly Breaking the Waves, I do not want to ever see again.
This is an amazing movie, the people who don't get it aren't looking at it hard enough
You've made up my mind, I only saw the trailer, but the moment u mentioned animals and children being hurt. No. I don't need that shot in my life. I really don't
Amirah Kukan I can understand that, as I did skip the duckling scene. But, you’re missing out on the greatest Serial Killer movie ever made.
alright then stay away
"art is many things"
This movie was great
Lars fan before the film: I love him!Half way through the filmSpewing in the bathroom.
Chris StuckmannI THINK YOU DONT'T KNOW WHAT YOURE TALKING. IF YOU DONT'T LIKE Lars von Trier MOVIES DON'T WATCH IT. PLEASE. "IF YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND A FILM, THAT DOESN'T' MEAN ITS A BAD MOVIE OR DIRECTOR FAILED."
honestly one of the best films i seen all year
Such a shit movie ewwww
I belive that his egocentrism is part of what he got right with the story. Serial Killers are very narcizistic . However, I agree with you with violent aspec of the film. I believe that was too much, even for the story. It missed the point and became pure formality, sometimes. I dont agree with what you said about the art dialogues. I believe that it was the most interesting part of the whole movie. It gave us a glimpse of a character that is totally misterious most of the time. Not only that but the arguments were very clever. If you after watching this, thinks that he is a Nazi, you didnt understand anything. I cant imagine a director whose art form is more oposed than the Nazi art than von trier. And I dont think this necessarily a complement.
I did not want to watch a breast cut off, but that bastard showed it again without a warning. I have no complaint. It is dark like old fairy tales, it is a parody of narcissistic evil.
What does the color red represent in the movie? Blood? Evil?
I didn't find anything informative and noteworthy in your discussion. Its quite evident that you haven't got proper idea about psychopaths or sociopaths, or the Dantean Hell or Bleakean Philosophy or Baudrillard's notion of iconography and iconoclasts or Foucault's idea of pleasure and pain. A serial killer always tries to murder and create. The same functionality is also served by Hannibal and moving a bit away by the character of Yellow King in True Detective in occult studies.I find it redundant to dissect the director's personality. Please appreciate the greatness of the film and yes, Jack is not meant for everybody.
To me, it was clearly Lars Von Trier's autobiography.The narcissism, lack of empathy, everything, was what I would picture him.
Why in the comments many people compare this film with "Serbian Film"?"Serbian Film" is just a very, very bad movie. Editing and directing are some of the worst I've seen in my life. And the script... is a joke of the century.I laughed all the way along because it's so amateurish and lame. At least Lars Von Trier (who we like or dislike) is a true genius filmmaker. Pretentious yes but genius !
Matt Dillon to be the New Ash in Evil Dead!
"Just give me a real movie". Well that's where you fucked up right there. Von Trier doesn't make "real" movies, if by real you mean conventional. He just doesn't, so you shouldn't expect that. And why would you want him to make a "real" movie anyways? Most movies are "real" movies, they are conventional with conventional plots and payoffs. Von Trier is in a fringe minority of filmmakers that makes something different (and still gets widespread recognition and releases), so I think there's room for him to do his own thing. But I guess in this world a movie is intelligent and compelling enough if it's made in Wakanda and no further exploration of the possibilities of the feature film medium is needed.BTW the whole movie was in large part an autobiography/self portrait of the director himself and a retrospective on his own filmmaking career. And he criticises himself very harshly and openly in the film. The whole egomaniac thing is also there and very much addressed, in Jack's character.
This movie was a breath of fresh air for horror cinema. Finally a true horror grounded somewhat in reality, rather than more of the same old paranormal bullshit we have been fed for the past 12 years since Paranormal Activity. I am sick to death of ghost movies, they are all the same, not to mention the countless remakes of old movies that mostly just butcher the original.Finally, we have a movie about a real serial killer, someone who could be your friend, your relative, or anyone walking the streets. There is nothing more scary than that. Coupled with real and convincing depictions of mental illness, such as narcissism, OCD, rage, bipolar, and depression.With an ending that is both artistically beautiful, has tons of hidden meanings and references to old biblical imagery.Not to mention the excellent writing and the outstanding acting from Matt Dillon.The film is a masterpiece and my fav from Lars Von Trier as I don't really like any of his previous movies and I never really knew of him until now. This film will be looked back upon years from now as a milestone in horror cinema.
Chris go review transformers and let the real films for the real critics
Can you do a movie review on Gaspar Noe's films?
This is not a review of the movie at all, you don't tell nothing about all the aspects of the movie (script, direction, camera, dialogues, atmospheres...) but instead bash Von Tier because of his ego. Really sucks.
Its a damn good film I thought it was perfectly executed. But i dont think ill be seeing it again anytime soon, gets pretty gruesome in some spots but I will watch again at some point
I like your Review 👍
Nice Lars Von Trier Review
After have watched this review a long time ago I saw the film. It is remarkable how Von Trier packed different emotions on its scenes: You wanted to laugh while you were discussed and sad. Damn, that is something unique.
Agreed 100%. Could have been a very good movie, I actually enjoyed the first 40 minutes like you said, then after that just turned into bullshit.
This movie is awesome.